Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mystery-ak
Judge Edith Brown Clemens (sp) mentioned by both Jeffrey Toobin and John King as a woman possible pick. King says she is conservative. Both Toobin and King say replacing O'Connor will be much rougher than replacing Rhenquist. Both call O'Connor a moderate.

Dana Bash, CNN Whwite House reporter agrees with John King, that Bush will move quickly naming O'Connor's replacement.

this is historic moment. I hope (probably in vain), that conservatives will support the President's pick, rather than one-issue bashing him to death, along with what he's going to get from the left. Now's the time for unity.

I hope people remember that without doubt, Bush will also get another supreme court pick when Rhenquist retires.

195 posted on 07/01/2005 7:39:25 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@The Tongues Gonna Wag.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: YaYa123
I hope (probably in vain), that conservatives will support the President's pick, rather than one-issue bashing him to death, along with what he's going to get from the left. Now's the time for unity

Blind support? No thanks, RINOs need not apply.
206 posted on 07/01/2005 7:40:36 AM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

Fox is reporting that this is the last day of the session a Supreme can announce retirement....is that true?


214 posted on 07/01/2005 7:41:17 AM PDT by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123

Bush statement at 11:15, no announcement of replacement at that time.


267 posted on 07/01/2005 7:46:33 AM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123
I hope (probably in vain), that conservatives will support the President's pick, rather than one-issue bashing him to death

If you're suggesting we should be happy with a pro-choice moderate, I disagree.

We will support the President's pick if he chooses the kind of judge he promised when we elected him.

And I think he will.

275 posted on 07/01/2005 7:47:42 AM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123
this is historic moment. I hope (probably in vain), that conservatives will support the President's pick, rather than one-issue bashing him to death,

One issue. This is THE ISSUE.

320 posted on 07/01/2005 7:53:05 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (we should not hesitate to resolve the tension in favor of the Constitution's original meaning-Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

To: YaYa123; cajungirl; ninenot; sittnick; onyx
45 million slaughtered babies are enough. O'Connor has been, at best, a raging pro-abort and the key vote that kept the babies dying. She was a disciple of the Planned Parenthood Goldwaters on the subject. They are gone. Now she is gone from public life. Good riddance.

The pro-life constituency has been the GOP's most important element for nearly thirty years. Without "Reagan Democrats", the GOP would be non-competitive rather than dominant.

Elementary politics suggests that every once in a while, you have to deliver for your own. Taking pro-lifers for granted at this point is about the dumbest thing the GOP Can do. A GOP which is responsible for putting the homicidal likes of John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Potter Stewart, William Brennan, Herod Blackmun, David (Confirmed Bachelor) Souter, and Anthony Turncoat Kennedy on SCOTUS to keep the abortion toll rising doesn't need to ask for understanding and patience. It needs to just name the justices who will drive the wooden stake through the heart of the abortion industry, surround its coffin with garlic, douse its corpse in Holy Water, expose the corpse to sunlight and hire Buffy just to make sure.

No more baby-killer "mistakes." No anal marriage "mistakes." No more "whoopsies" of any kind as to SCOTUS nominations. Use recess appointments as necessary and repeat as necessary. Nuke the filibuster.

We need a nominee who can read (the Constitution itself not foreign court decisions or the delusions of Herod Blackmun or the law review articles of Lawrence Tribe) and if such a nominee is confirmed it would be helpful if the new associate justice would actually apply the constitution as written and to refuse to apply parts of the constitution that aren't there at all and never were like homo"marriage" and babykilling and any make-believe "right" of any gummint to violate the Second Amendment RTKBA and any make-believe "right" of gummint to take anyone's private property to give to some other private party as a gummint tax-revenue raising scheme, among several hundred other usurpations by SCOTUS.

If the Senate Demonrats want to get in the way, trample them by any means necessary and by every means convenient and entertaining. Republican "moderates" likewise. Allowing the babies to be saved is the price that the RINO materialists will have to pay to keep their tax cuts secure.

Lest there be any misunderstanding, I have supported Dubya from Day 1 here and will continue to do so but he REALLY needs to deliver on SCOTUS each and every opportunity with an absolute vengeance.

1,017 posted on 07/01/2005 11:33:24 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson