![](http://www.ourfuture.org/images/33-d9376_6_1040resize.jpg)
Incredible.
1 posted on
07/01/2005 3:57:12 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: SkyPilot
Sounds like Pelosi is taking flip-flop lessons from John Kerry (the guy who went to Viet Nam)
2 posted on
07/01/2005 4:01:57 AM PDT by
demkicker
(A skunk sat on a stump; the stump thunk the skunk stunk; the skunk thunk the stump stunk.)
To: SkyPilot
:D She's laughable and not worth the effort.
3 posted on
07/01/2005 4:09:16 AM PDT by
saveliberty
(Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
To: SkyPilot
C:\Program Files\America Online 7.0\download\witherspoon.htm
I WANT TO VOMIT!
WITHERSPOON WAS ONE OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNERS AND THE ONLY PASTOR.
HOW DO THESE PEOPLE GET ELECTED???????????
GODSPEED!
4 posted on
07/01/2005 4:10:41 AM PDT by
alpha-8-25-02
("SAVED BY GRACE AND GRACE ALONE")
To: SkyPilot
Nancy Pelosi is a socialist. She believes you have a privilege to keep your property - as long as the government allows. And her views on the courts is that as long as they rule the way liberals want, they're sacrosanct. Her unctousness is enough to make one gag. This is not why the colonists shed blood, fortunes and their sacred honor to secure the independence of our country!
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
7 posted on
07/01/2005 4:21:39 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: SkyPilot
Pelosi:
How did she get elected?
Why did she get elected?
One thing for sure: You can count on her to add humor(clueless) to a Dem news conference.
10 posted on
07/01/2005 4:30:45 AM PDT by
jos65
To: SkyPilot
Why is it incredible? She has to be opposed to anything a Republican says.
Todays Democrat party has NO ideas. Their only principle appears to be 100% in opposition to anything Republicans say or do.
To: SkyPilot
18 posted on
07/01/2005 4:52:45 AM PDT by
raybbr
To: SkyPilot
I have yet to hear or read this.
The Kelo decision by the US Supreme Court is consistent with leftist political theory and practice. Isn't communism and socialism about redistribution? Isn't it the role of government to take from A and give to B by force?
The only difference in this situation is that the taking is to benefit the so-called wealthy or powerful.
Don't be fooled by leftists giving protest lip service; they are actually pleased with the decision as case precedent to future redistribution causes. "If we can take to benefit the rich why can't taking be for the benefit of the children"?
You will be hearing that in the future
To: SkyPilot
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, said she "would oppose any legislation that says that we would withhold funds for the enforcement of any decision of the Supreme Court, no matter how opposed I am to that decision." She then added: "And I'm not saying that I'm opposed to this decision." Nancy Pelosi, one of the leaders of the Democrat party, agrees with the seizure of land for private interests.
It makes sense, though: Communists have always stolen what they want.
24 posted on
07/01/2005 4:59:50 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(Looks like the Supreme Court wants to play Cowboys and Homeowners.)
To: SkyPilot
Please, please, please, let Nancy Pelosi lead the defense of this insane ruling....
I won't be satisfied till we have 300 seats in the House and 70 in the Senate. If Nancy gets us there, more power to her....
25 posted on
07/01/2005 5:01:42 AM PDT by
ABG(anybody but Gore)
(Ketchup Boy is the George Costanza of the US Senate)
To: SkyPilot
Is it no wonder that San Francisco is one of the few cities in the country that is experiencing a population decline.
To: SkyPilot
even more dumb than Box-o-Rox and thats saying something. This lady ought to be fully exposed for her stupid contempt of anything that smacks of conservative thought.
To: SkyPilot
No surprise.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., the likely new minority leader in the House of Representatives, serves on the executive committee of the socialist-leaning Progressive Caucus, a bloc of about 60 votes or nearly 30 percent of the minority vote in the lower chamber...
"The Democratic Socialists of America's chief organizing goal is to work within the Democratic Party and remove the stigma attached to "socialism" in the eyes of most Americans."
http://www.handguncontrolinc.org/pelosi1.htm
To: SkyPilot
Actually, I'd have thought the crapweasel dems who be jumping up and down in delight over this decision. It is just what the neocommunist socialists have always wanted, the ability for government to redistribute wealth to those who truly deserve it.
The government authority can already seize those three million dollar house that sit on a toral of six acres, and build a new jail. Now, they can seize the land and turn it over to five black guys to build a golf driving range/ The dems should love this stuff. Look at the incentive it give them to regain power. They always been for the abolition of private property, well, other peoples' private property. Some of the old socialists must be delighted. Beware of the words of any dem on this subject!!!
34 posted on
07/01/2005 5:19:23 AM PDT by
Tacis
("Democrats - The Party of Traitors, Treachery and Treason!")
To: SkyPilot
36 posted on
07/01/2005 5:22:25 AM PDT by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: SkyPilot
Arguing that Congress has no business interfering with the ruling unless it wants to amend the Constitution
Why bother, the constitutions says "for public use" and 5 justices could give a rats a$$.
To: SkyPilot
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, said she "would oppose any legislation that says that we would withhold funds for the enforcement of any decision of the Supreme Court, no matter how opposed I am to that decision."
She then added: "And I'm not saying that I'm opposed to this decision."
I am confused, is she actually picking a side on this. This would be funny if it were not so sad. What kind of idiot would vote for an idiot like pelosi. This is the democrat leader? Unbelievable.
To: SkyPilot
Not incredible. Typical. To the DemocRats, government IS their god.
52 posted on
07/01/2005 6:02:14 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: SkyPilot
It doesn't surprise me to see minority "leaders" like Maxine Waters on the anti-New London bandwagon.
I'm sure that this decision strikes a chord with minorities who can remember a time in the South when racist state governments screwed around with their right to become property owners, as well as voters, etc.
If Pelosi does not play this right this is just one more issue (gay marriage, vouchers, faith based initatives, abortion, etc.) where she will find herself on the opposite side of the fence from the minorities she claims to support.
Someone also needs to ask Pelosi if God was speaking when SCOTUS handed down their decision in Bush v. Gore. Or How about the Dale case involving gay adult leaders in the Boy Scouts?
53 posted on
07/01/2005 6:04:13 AM PDT by
BaBaStooey
(Ethiopia: The New Happiest Place on Earth.)
To: SkyPilot
"No court that denies property rights will long respect and recognize other basic human rights."Talk about crystal clarity! Tom has hit the judge-nomination ball right in the "sweet spot."
61 posted on
07/01/2005 6:14:34 AM PDT by
Snickersnee
(Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson