Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress assails domain ruling (Pelosi compares court to God)
The Washington Times ^ | 1 July 05 | Charles Hurt

Posted on 07/01/2005 3:57:10 AM PDT by SkyPilot

Congress lashed out at the Supreme Court yesterday for expanding government powers of eminent domain and vowed to ban any federal funds for state and local governments that employ the new authority.

***snip***

In response, a bipartisan group of senators and House members joined yesterday in introducing legislation that will withhold federal funding from any state or local government that tries to use those expanded powers.

"The Supreme Court voted last week to undo private property rights and to empower governments to kick people out of their homes and give them to someone else because they feel like it," said House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, Texas Republican. "No court that denies property rights will long respect and recognize other basic human rights."

The decision was particularly explosive amid speculation that one or more Supreme Court justices may retire in coming weeks. Republicans who already view the Supreme Court as power-hungry said the decision will rally Americans behind their effort to make the court more conservative.

"The only silver lining to the cloud of this decision is the possibility that this time the court has finally gone too far," Mr. DeLay said.

***snip***

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, said she "would oppose any legislation that says that we would withhold funds for the enforcement of any decision of the Supreme Court, no matter how opposed I am to that decision."

She then added: "And I'm not saying that I'm opposed to this decision."

Arguing that Congress has no business interfering with the ruling unless it wants to amend the Constitution, Mrs. Pelosi said: "This is almost as if God has spoken."

(Excerpt) Read more at insider.washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; 109thcancer; blackrobedcommies; eminentdomain; kelo; meninblack; propertyrights; rickperrymustgo; supremecourt; ttc; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: raybbr
Bleech. That woman sure likes to point a lot. She reminds me of an 6th grade public school math teacher I had that couldn't add, subtract, or multiply fractions herself if her life depended on it.
21 posted on 07/01/2005 4:55:08 AM PDT by SkyPilot (Eliminate, eradicate, and stamp out redundancy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Cut off Pelosi's finger and she'll be unable to spout such nonsense.


22 posted on 07/01/2005 4:55:41 AM PDT by Carolinamom (NC motto: to be rather than to seem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Bleech.

Did you mean "blech" as in "That's disgusting."?

Or did you mean 'bleach" as in "Now I need to clean my screen."?

;^)

23 posted on 07/01/2005 4:58:24 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, said she "would oppose any legislation that says that we would withhold funds for the enforcement of any decision of the Supreme Court, no matter how opposed I am to that decision." She then added: "And I'm not saying that I'm opposed to this decision."

Nancy Pelosi, one of the leaders of the Democrat party, agrees with the seizure of land for private interests.

It makes sense, though: Communists have always stolen what they want.

24 posted on 07/01/2005 4:59:50 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Looks like the Supreme Court wants to play Cowboys and Homeowners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Please, please, please, let Nancy Pelosi lead the defense of this insane ruling....

I won't be satisfied till we have 300 seats in the House and 70 in the Senate. If Nancy gets us there, more power to her....


25 posted on 07/01/2005 5:01:42 AM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) (Ketchup Boy is the George Costanza of the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Is it no wonder that San Francisco is one of the few cities in the country that is experiencing a population decline.


26 posted on 07/01/2005 5:01:57 AM PDT by speedbrake2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)
Please, please, please, let Nancy Pelosi lead the defense of this insane ruling....

Agreed. This is a common-man issue; in other words, even Joe Sixpack can understand when his house is in danger of being stolen.

Problem is, only DeLay (and a few others) are railing against it. Where's Bush???

27 posted on 07/01/2005 5:05:09 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Looks like the Supreme Court wants to play Cowboys and Homeowners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

Your question is a perfectly good one. Congress has the power of the purse and withhold funds, it's in Article I.


28 posted on 07/01/2005 5:05:19 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

even more dumb than Box-o-Rox and thats saying something. This lady ought to be fully exposed for her stupid contempt of anything that smacks of conservative thought.


29 posted on 07/01/2005 5:07:31 AM PDT by FROGTOWN CONSERVATIVE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FROGTOWN CONSERVATIVE
DUMB

DUMBER

30 posted on 07/01/2005 5:12:15 AM PDT by FROGTOWN CONSERVATIVE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

No surprise.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., the likely new minority leader in the House of Representatives, serves on the executive committee of the socialist-leaning Progressive Caucus, a bloc of about 60 votes or nearly 30 percent of the minority vote in the lower chamber...

"The Democratic Socialists of America's chief organizing goal is to work within the Democratic Party and remove the stigma attached to "socialism" in the eyes of most Americans."

http://www.handguncontrolinc.org/pelosi1.htm


31 posted on 07/01/2005 5:14:49 AM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Problem is, only DeLay (and a few others) are railing against it. Where's Bush???

Afraid someone will propose putting up an amusment park on a certain ranch near Crawford, Texas?

32 posted on 07/01/2005 5:18:40 AM PDT by LRS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PogySailor

It would infer that she sees the liberal activist judiciary as her house of worship, I think.


33 posted on 07/01/2005 5:19:09 AM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Actually, I'd have thought the crapweasel dems who be jumping up and down in delight over this decision. It is just what the neocommunist socialists have always wanted, the ability for government to redistribute wealth to those who truly deserve it.

The government authority can already seize those three million dollar house that sit on a toral of six acres, and build a new jail. Now, they can seize the land and turn it over to five black guys to build a golf driving range/ The dems should love this stuff. Look at the incentive it give them to regain power. They always been for the abolition of private property, well, other peoples' private property. Some of the old socialists must be delighted. Beware of the words of any dem on this subject!!!

34 posted on 07/01/2005 5:19:23 AM PDT by Tacis ("Democrats - The Party of Traitors, Treachery and Treason!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo

:) Thank you!


35 posted on 07/01/2005 5:20:56 AM PDT by saveliberty (Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Pelosi - da fangpi.


36 posted on 07/01/2005 5:22:25 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LRS

How about seizing Bab's oceanfront estate in Malibu and putting up a few thousand timeshare units? That will get the two California RAT princesses to take notice


37 posted on 07/01/2005 5:23:03 AM PDT by FROGTOWN CONSERVATIVE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Arguing that Congress has no business interfering with the ruling unless it wants to amend the Constitution

Why bother, the constitutions says "for public use" and 5 justices could give a rats a$$.
38 posted on 07/01/2005 5:25:30 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stopem

We will learn a costly lesson, that is if we don't attempt to work WITH < cough > Democrats on this issue, erosion of Americans' right to property and liberty will exponentially increase.


39 posted on 07/01/2005 5:28:09 AM PDT by azhenfud ("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud

Huh!
The appointment of liberal judges by polititians from both sides of the aisle has resulted in this decision. Only at the ballot box(the voters)can we eliminate these mistakes.


40 posted on 07/01/2005 5:34:42 AM PDT by speedbrake2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson