Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion

We'll either develop and stage nuclear bunker busters, or we'll use cratering nukes for the same purpose when the time comes for their necessity. ...one or the other. Nuclear bunker busters would be much less hazardous and easier to clean up.


15 posted on 07/01/2005 2:12:11 AM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: familyop
"Nuclear bunker busters would be much less hazardous and easier to clean up."

My understanding is that we're doing research into ways of making much smaller bunker buster nukes. Smaller nukes would minimize blast damage and dispersal of radiation, and DiFi should be happy about this (but oddly enough, she isn't).

21 posted on 07/01/2005 1:26:47 PM PDT by defenderSD ("I am not a troll" said the troll as a thunderous Zot descended on him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson