Skip to comments.
Inherit the Windbags: Pushing Ideology into Classrooms-(IntelDesign disturbs Planned Parenthood!)
PLANNED PARENTHOOD.ORG ^
| JUNE 30, 2005
| Eric Plosky
Posted on 06/30/2005 10:35:00 PM PDT by CHARLITE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
06/30/2005 10:35:02 PM PDT
by
CHARLITE
To: CyberAnt
For your interest.
Char :)
2
posted on
06/30/2005 10:35:55 PM PDT
by
CHARLITE
(I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
To: CHARLITE
I'm not sure why "Planned Parenthood" has taken an interest in this issue, but I always feel safe taking a position opposite theirs.
3
posted on
06/30/2005 10:50:43 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(No matter how hot she is, some man, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t)
To: CHARLITE
I think planed parenthood has taken this on because it's too much like religion for them to feel safe about it.
They're afraid of religion creeping into the minds of their potential customers because religion makes people see life as a gift from God and not to be destroyed.
With planed parenthood, it's all about the money.
4
posted on
06/30/2005 11:24:04 PM PDT
by
GloriaJane
(http://music.download.com/gloriajane "Seems Like Our Press Has Turned Against Our Country")
To: GloriaJane
5
posted on
07/01/2005 1:46:12 AM PDT
by
B4Ranch
( Report every illegal alien that you meet. Call 866-347-2423, Employers use 888-464-4218)
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Right Wing Professor; ...
Not exactly news, but perhaps we should ping the list. What do y'all think?
6
posted on
07/01/2005 3:47:58 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
Sure. With allies like Planned Parenthood, who needs enemies?
7
posted on
07/01/2005 3:59:01 AM PDT
by
Junior
(“Even if you are one-in-a-million, there are still 6,000 others just like you.”)
To: Junior
Being associated, even indirectly, with Planned Parenthood is distasteful, but this foreshadows how the MSM is going to play this issue: the pro-science good-guys (
i.e. the leftwing freakoid dems) against the dimwitted anti-science conservatives. I've seen this coming and it's very troubling, because this is probably the one issue where the dems are correct. Not that they're all that scientific, given their history of backing global warming, "scientific" socialism, and junk-science litigation, but this time the conservatives are whacked out, and the dems will take full advantage.
So I'll crank up the ping machine ...
8
posted on
07/01/2005 6:21:41 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
EvolutionPing |
A pro-evolution science list with over 280 names. See the list's description at my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added or dropped. |
|
|
|
9
posted on
07/01/2005 6:24:36 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
To: Jaysun; CHARLITE; GloriaJane
I'm not sure why "Planned Parenthood" has taken an interest in this issue, but I always feel safe taking a position opposite theirs.Not this time. I agree 100% and this is damaging the conservative party in a big way IMHO.
Religion should not be taught in a science class. And make no mistake, ID is religion, just all wrapped up in a pretty wrapper to try and sound scientific even though it is not.
11
posted on
07/01/2005 7:04:23 AM PDT
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: PatrickHenry
It's more than distasteful, and I think it's intellectually dishonest to decry the insertion of ideology in the classroom when in reality the only reason they don't like it is because it isn't their preferred ideology. Science is science and as such is the pursuit of truth. As a Catholic, I know that truth cannot contradict truth, and I have no problem with whatever theories science puts forward in an attempt to explain the world around us. Planned Parenthood and their ilk are not the least bit interested in truth.
12
posted on
07/01/2005 7:10:49 AM PDT
by
visualops
(http://www.visualops.com)
To: Jaysun
Only in the extremist doctrines of the orthodoxy of Humanist Secularism does abortion-on-demand find a root, and only in those same extemist doctrines is godless evolution rooted. One root, same tree. The "Planned [non-]Parenthood" people are smart enough to understand the connect.
Note the difference between extremist and wacko branches of this religion. Planned Parenthood and Evolutionism are off the extremist trunk. Scientology and UFO-SETI-SAGAN folks are off the wacko trunk.
13
posted on
07/01/2005 7:11:27 AM PDT
by
bvw
To: bvw
Only in the extremist doctrines of the orthodoxy of Humanist Secularism does abortion-on-demand find a root, and only in those same extemist doctrines is godless evolution rooted. Total codswallop!
Note the difference between extremist and wacko branches of this religion. Planned Parenthood and Evolutionism are off the extremist trunk. Scientology and UFO-SETI-SAGAN folks are off the wacko trunk.
Clueless. A refund on your education may be in order.
14
posted on
07/01/2005 7:18:01 AM PDT
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: RadioAstronomer
SETI message incoming:
> - .... . | ... - .. -. --. | --- ..-. | - .-. ..- - .... <
15
posted on
07/01/2005 7:26:39 AM PDT
by
bvw
To: bvw
Only in the extremist doctrines of the orthodoxy of Humanist Secularism does abortion-on-demand find a root, and only in those same extemist doctrines is godless evolution rooted. As you well know, there are plenty of Christiians who are pro-life but who also accept evolution.
16
posted on
07/01/2005 7:36:08 AM PDT
by
Modernman
("Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made." -Bismarck)
To: CHARLITE
I'm an atheist and evolutionist and I am also pro-life. The efforts to force ID into science education are comparable to attempts to force the sex-positive agenda into sex education.
17
posted on
07/01/2005 8:25:54 AM PDT
by
RightWingAtheist
(Creationism is not conservative!)
To: CHARLITE
Of course Planned Infanticide is upset. The group was founded and run by atheists.
The minister's work is also important and he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.--Margaret Sanger
Letter written to Clarence Gamble, 10 December 1939
18
posted on
07/01/2005 8:32:25 AM PDT
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: PatrickHenry
I look at this as an example of stopped clock phenomena.
19
posted on
07/01/2005 9:38:10 AM PDT
by
Gumlegs
To: Jaysun
"but I always feel safe taking a position opposite theirs."
Even a broken clock is right twice a day. This is an example
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson