Posted on 06/30/2005 9:53:59 PM PDT by yoe
Former Clinton National Security Advisor Sandy Berger pled guilty on April 1 to smuggling five classified documents, including a highly secret memorandum.
Two men walk into the National Archives [no this isn't a joke] one steals letters dating back to the civil war then sells them on EBay. The other steals classified documents related to terrorism then destroys them in order to deceive investigators. Which man receives the stiffer penalty.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalledger.com ...
The Left owns the judge in this case?
Am I making this up, or does anyone else remember something similar?
Those big numbers help when it's early in the a.m. .... will be calling. I naively thought Berger would actually be getting smacked down on this. The jokes on a lot of us
United States Magistrate Judge
District of Columbia
Washington, D.C.
Chambers: (202) 354-3070
BTTT
because he is a lib plain and simple. Rules only apply to conservatives.
Kinda how cops don't give speeding tickets to other cops?
We need Mike Pence for President.
Very good analysis and questions.
It is hard to say what did, or what might have happened, with the Sandy Burglar deal -- there are so many double standards and complicity in Washington nowadays that one can only wonder. We certainly know who Burglar was/is protecting. But it may go beyond that.
Very difficult to sort through a situation where NO PERSON CAN BE TRUSTED. A sad days for this country, really.
The "infamous" pants stuffer won't go jail because the pussies in my party (aka the GOP) don't have the will fortitude to take their jobs seriously. Don't get me started.............!
Nice take, both posters----it could be postulated that Berger was not covering for the Clintons as is commonly thought, but that the Archives theft was to reinforce Berger's usefulness as candidate John Kerry's ntl security advisor---to get something to use against GWB. That possibility became more apparent when it was discovered that the US Pentagon traitor Franklin gave US ntl security documents to AIPAC, and that candidate Kerry had hired Steve Grossman, a past AIPAC president as his key campaign advisor.
Suspicions arose that candidate Kerry was being coached, and that somebody might have been leaking privileged national security information to Kerry in the effort to defeat President Bush.
Berger was serving as Kerry's national security consultant when he pilfered the classified US national security documents from the National Archives.
So, the Berger theft was not as originally suspected (a Clinton cover-up)----but an attempt to compromise the 2004 election to undermine George W Bush's reelection.
Americans need to know the extent of culpability engendered by these activities--- primarily whether our President was harmed ----and whether Sen Kerry and his advisors--- Steve Grossman and Sandy Berger---played any part in undercutting the reelection chances of President Bush through the use of stolen classified documents, and, of course, the degree to which spying impaired President Bush's ability to conduct US foreign policy.
One of the most important questions Americans need to know about the connection between the Berger thievery, and the AIPAC-Pentagon treachery, is the degree to which these activities hurt President Bush and the president's 2004 campaign.
One of the most important questions Americans need to know about the connection between the Berger thievery, and the AIPAC-Pentagon treachery, is the degree to which these activities hurt President Bush and the president's 2004 campaign.
------
Regardless, the question remains: Why is Burglar not IN THE SLAMMER??? We continue to see examples of how CRIME IN WASHINGTON PAYS!!!
"So, the Berger theft was not as originally suspected (a Clinton cover-up)----but an attempt to compromise the 2004 election to undermine George W Bush's reelection."
There could still be some incriminating evidence against Clinton (as most of us thought) in whatever Berger stole, but at the same time this is very intriguing, and makes even more sense. Thanks for the posts.
Berger needs to be in jail.
(1) A coordinated attempt to coach Kerry----positioning Berger to get a Cabinet post if Kerry was elected.
(2) Covering up for the Clintons' pre-911 negligence.
(3) And finally, even after the Archives burglary, Berger was slithering around Washington involved in profiting from US government business in Iraq.
Berger's Firm to Aid Oil Interests in Iraq
By Judy Sarasohn
Washington Post Thursday, September 16, 2004; Page A29
Stonebridge International, the "global strategy firm" founded by Berger, has taken on an interesting client, Gulfsands Petroleum Ltd., a private Houston-based oil and gas company. Gulfsands, along with its larger partner Devon Energy Corp. of Oklahoma City, has oil and gas exploration and development interests in Syria. And now Gulfsands is looking to Iraq.
"Stonebridge is assisting Gulfsands in organizing meetings in Washington with administration officials to discuss the company's business interests in Iraq and U.S. policy toward Syria," Stonebridge Vice Chairman H.P. Goldfield said in an e-mail response to written questions.
Remember, this was after Berger's Archives pilfer.
WOW, the plot thickens..
LOL .. smart gets ya zip, nada, zilch in the gubamit cheese line. :-)
an aside from Berger..
Look at the trail of GBush1,, and where he has been and served..
Ambassador to China, CIA Director, VeeP and President.. failed to suash Saddam and look at his results, not that he may have had anything to do with anything much wherever he served, but .. :-)
just a thought, like anyone cares what the 'anti'Kennedy' clan has doneacting as US royalty if there is such a thing. lol
squash
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.