Posted on 06/30/2005 7:43:20 PM PDT by bayourod
COPENHAGEN, Denmark President Bush said in a Danish TV interview aired today that adhering to the Kyoto treaty on climate change would have "wrecked" the U.S. economy.
"Kyoto would have wrecked our economy. I couldn't in good faith have signed Kyoto," Bush told the Danish Broadcasting Corp., noting that the treaty did not include other nations including India and China that he called "big polluters."
Earlier, British Prime Minister Tony Blair said climate change was likely the most serious threat to the globe and that there would be no solution without U.S. involvement. The United States is the world's biggest producer of greenhouse gases, which have been blamed for contributing to global warming.
"The only solution to this is going to come as one that includes America," Blair told a London audience of young people for an MTV special.
Later in the Danish interview, Bush called the U.S. dependence on oil from the Middle East a "national security problem."
"We're hooked on oil from the Middle East, which is a national security problem and an economic security problem," Bush said, adding that the United States was looking at alternatives fuels.
Some of us have awakened. Most of FreeRepublic, for example. Maybe half the American electorate. Credulity goes only so far, after a few years you tend to figure out some things.
Here's where and how we can use political judo to turn our opponents' environmental momentum against them and for us.
Kyoto, you see, exempted China's underground coal fires from its pollution reduction quota. Those fires, however, contribute *MORE* air pollution than Kyoto would otherwise reduce.
Where *we* win on this Kyoto nonsensical environmentalism issue is by insisting that Kyoto's replacement treaty deal soley with putting out such massive polluting sources as underground coal fires.
Who else should be responsible for the pollution coming from government land, after all?!
So forget all of the Kyoto nonsense about private businesses having to pay for pollution "credits" from 3rd world kleptocracies (read: wealth transfer)...We can offer the world *real* environmental progress at the Chinese government's expense (OK, we'll throw in a little money for them if Europe, South America, and Japan do too).
Underground coal fires called a 'catastrophe'
Saturday, February 15, 2003
By Michael Woods , Post-Gazette National Bureau
DENVER -- ... a more common coal mine disaster is getting little attention, scientists said yesterday. It's the fire below.
Underground coal fires are relentlessly incinerating millions of tons of coal around the world.
The blazes spew out huge amounts of air pollutants, force residents to flee their homes, send toxic runoff flowing into waterways, and leave the land above as scarred as a battlefield.
"A global environmental catastrophe" is how geologist Glenn B. Stracher described the situation.
Stracher, of East Georgia College in Swainsboro, organized an international symposium on the topic at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
"This symposium is dedicated to disclosing the severity of the coal fires problem," Stracher said, noting that some of the fires have been burning for centuries with few people aware of the problem.
Concern and action is needed, he said, because of the environmental impact -- especially of mega-fires burning in India, China and elsewhere in Asia. One coal fire in northern China, for instance, is burning over an area more than 3,000 miles wide and almost 450 miles long.
"The direct and indirect economic losses from coal fires are huge," said Paul M. van Dijk, a Dutch scientist who is tracking the Chinese blazes via satellite.
He estimated that the Chinese fires alone consume 120 million tons of coal annually. That's almost as much as the annual coal production in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Illinois combined.
The Chinese fires also make a big, hidden contribution to global warming through the greenhouse effect, scientists said. Each year they release 360 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, as much as all the cars and light trucks in the United States.
Soot from the fires in China, India and other Asian countries are a source of the "Asian Brown Haze." It's a 2-mile thick cloud of soot, acid droplets and other material that sometimes stretches across South Asia from Afghanistan to Sri Lanka.
The cloud causes acid rain that damages crops, cuts sunlight reaching the ground by 10 to 15 percent, and has been implicated in thousands of annual lung disease deaths.
Mine fires are frustratingly difficult and costly to extinguish, panelists said.
Weapons range from backfilling mine shafts to cutting off the oxygen supply with a new foam-like grout that's squirted into mine shafts like shaving cream and then expands to sniff out the fire.
Most are simply left alone to burn until they eventually exhaust their fuel supply.
Michael Woods can be reached at mwoods@nationalpress.com
Good post!
I didn't know that, thanks.
That would be could too.
There are long-burning fires in abandoned coal mines in the US as well. None that big however. :')
Fantastic!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.