Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: expatpat

Beside the point. Britain -- under Churchill -- would not have remained neutral in any case. But Norway, if not attacked? How do we know? And no country can fairly be blamed for not having a Churchill.


45 posted on 07/01/2005 5:13:50 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: California Patriot
But Norway, if not attacked?

We know because the attack on Norway occurred long after Sweden had already caved.

51 posted on 07/01/2005 7:15:17 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson