Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: highball
Not surprising - Arlington did it for the Texas Rangers a decade ago.

But wasn't the Ballpark in Arlington built in the parking lot of the Rangers' previous stadium? That land was already owned by Rangers.

11 posted on 06/30/2005 2:28:36 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Paleo Conservative

Nope, they took private lands as well. There's a good summary here:

http://emdo.blogspot.com/2005/05/demolishing-sports-welfare-reason.html

I believe this is why we haven't seen W come out against the Kelo decision. His opponents would hammer him with the Rangers' sweetheart deal.


14 posted on 06/30/2005 2:34:39 PM PDT by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
According to this Article eminent domain was used to acquire 13 acres of private property for the stadium. Bush also pushed for a tax hike for the stadium. No wonder he's kept a low profile on this issue.
15 posted on 06/30/2005 2:34:49 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson