Skip to comments.
Eminent domain authorized for new (Cowboys) stadium
KDFW News ^
| 6/29/05
Posted on 06/30/2005 2:20:18 PM PDT by TrebleRebel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: TrebleRebel
Not surprising - Arlington did it for the Texas Rangers a decade ago.
2
posted on
06/30/2005 2:21:55 PM PDT
by
highball
("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
To: TrebleRebel
Apres le decision... la deluge.
3
posted on
06/30/2005 2:22:39 PM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(The legislative process is like the digestive process, same end product)
To: TrebleRebel
is next march a little ambitious esp when people are willing to take this to the courts?
4
posted on
06/30/2005 2:23:00 PM PDT
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: TrebleRebel
Damn that David Souter anyway.
To: tfecw
Probably not now, post Kelo v. New London.
To: TrebleRebel
Well they are going to lose :) but even losing takes time.
7
posted on
06/30/2005 2:25:18 PM PDT
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: TrebleRebel
Probably not now, post Kelo v. New London. Why not? Like Connecticut, Texas law allows municipalities to condemn private property through eminent domain for use by private companies.
To: TrebleRebel
And where's the outrage from our "conservative" public figures, anyway?
9
posted on
06/30/2005 2:27:21 PM PDT
by
highball
("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
To: Non-Sequitur
Just my point...things will happen alot faster for Jerry Jones now.
To: highball
Not surprising - Arlington did it for the Texas Rangers a decade ago. But wasn't the Ballpark in Arlington built in the parking lot of the Rangers' previous stadium? That land was already owned by Rangers.
11
posted on
06/30/2005 2:28:36 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: TrebleRebel
The Texas Constitution offers far greater protection to homeowners than the federal.
"Come and Take It"
To: highball
Not surprising - Arlington did it for the Texas Rangers a decade ago. Wow, at last, something that might really truly have been "Bush's Fault"
13
posted on
06/30/2005 2:33:53 PM PDT
by
Plutarch
To: Paleo Conservative
14
posted on
06/30/2005 2:34:39 PM PDT
by
highball
("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
To: Paleo Conservative
According to this
Article eminent domain was used to acquire 13 acres of private property for the stadium. Bush also pushed for a tax hike for the stadium. No wonder he's kept a low profile on this issue.
To: highball
I believe this is why we haven't seen W come out against the Kelo decision. His opponents would hammer him with the Rangers' sweetheart deal.It's why we haven't seen very many politicians of ANY stripe come out against this decision. If you want to have a meeting of every politician at every level of government nationally who HASN'T been involved one way or another in eminent domain proceedings, you could hold that meeting in a 7-11.
And for those jurisdictions that don't use eminent domain to take private property for private development, there's always abuse of zoning laws as a possibility -- or new regulations, higher taxes, etc.
16
posted on
06/30/2005 2:39:16 PM PDT
by
You Dirty Rats
(Forget Blackwell for Governor! Blackwell for Senate '06!)
To: Non-Sequitur
Very interesting article. Thanks for the link.
To: Non-Sequitur
According to this Article eminent domain was used to acquire 13 acres of private property for the stadium. Bush also pushed for a tax hike for the stadium. No wonder he's kept a low profile on this issue. The city of Arlington had an election and the tax increase passed by a very wide margin in an election with high turnout.
18
posted on
06/30/2005 2:47:24 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: TrebleRebel
Last night's ruling paves the wayInteresting choice of words.
To: Paleo Conservative
The city of Arlington had an election and the tax increase passed by a very wide margin in an election with high turnout. And with the strong support of George W. Bush, who went out and stumped for passage of the tax increase.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson