Again, the same must be done to ALL of the Justices, not just to the majority. The reason is to encourage the minority to fight harder against such opinions, and pull out all the stops when the crazoids on the Court decide to screw the elderly, the handicapped and the poor.
Unfortunately, if you do the same to ALL of them, they must ALL recuse themselves from the case, and by precedent already set by Kelo vs. New London, we would not have a reversal of the Kelo decision. Yes, they would lose their homes, but we would still be shorted our property rights since no new precedent would be set to correct the injustice already done.
Again, the same must be done to ALL of the Justices
AND some senators and reps. I'll bet MANY of them own some prime real estate that is not being used to the best 'tas' advantage for their respective communities.
When he made his ruling I am sure he never thought that this could come back and slap him in the face. This is one of the best examples of someone who will either back down and change his ruling or fight against his own decision. It's beautiful!!
Now, that is carrying a grudge a bit too far.