So it is a secret which is not so secret. The carrier will be ready in time for Beijing Olympic Game, maximizing "patriotic ferver."
I am sure many Chinese would be impressed with the sight of fighters taking-off and landing on the carrier's flight deck.:-)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; maui_hawaii; tallhappy; Dr. Marten; Jeff Head; Khurkris; hedgetrimmer; ...
To: TigerLikesRooster
They can sure build them cheaper than we can.
3 posted on
06/29/2005 5:35:35 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: TigerLikesRooster
"I am sure many Chinese would be impressed with the sight of fighters taking-off and landing on the carrier's flight deck.:-)"
If they fly like that idiot that midaired the EP-3 back in 2001, whoever's working deck crew will be hating life.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Yeah. They have so much experience with carrier landings.
5 posted on
06/29/2005 5:36:08 PM PDT by
AppyPappy
To: TigerLikesRooster
Hmmmm.....Come on at us Chicoms, perhaps the Japanese can instruct you about the futility of going against the USN.
To: TigerLikesRooster
I wonder when we will start taking the Chinese seriously. The companies I used to work for gave away the farm to set up manufacturing and distribution in China and I keep wondering when that short sightedness will come back to haunt us.
10 posted on
06/29/2005 5:38:17 PM PDT by
GBA
To: TigerLikesRooster
"One of the largest carriers of WWII, Shinano was originally planned to be the third installment of Yamato class battleships. The construction of this monstrous vessel was started soon after the Japanese defeat at Midway and was completed on Nov. 19, 1944. Its overall length stretched to 266m and it displaced 62,000t. It was well protected with heavily armored sides, inherited from Yamato, and a reinforced flight deck able to withstand the direct blast of a 500kg bomb. On its way to be fitted out however, it was spotted and torpedoed by an American submarine, later capsizing off the shores of Shionomisaki."
To: TigerLikesRooster
Can we secretly destroy it?!!
12 posted on
06/29/2005 5:39:09 PM PDT by
Moorings
To: TigerLikesRooster
Sub target practice to start in 2008 in the China SEA. HE HE HE HA HA HA.
13 posted on
06/29/2005 5:39:41 PM PDT by
handy old one
(It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. Aristotle)
To: TigerLikesRooster
390 million!? We have radar systems that cost more than that.
I thought you needed 40 knots of wind to launch a plane? I guess they are banking on head winds.
To: TigerLikesRooster
It's really difficult to build an Air Craft Carrier in secret.
16 posted on
06/29/2005 5:40:07 PM PDT by
muawiyah
(q)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I'll almost feel sorry for them when a 688 sinks that sucker with a full spread of Mark V torpedoes. If it's anything like the Charles DeGaulle, it'll be fun to keep around for awhile, though.
18 posted on
06/29/2005 5:43:08 PM PDT by
Excuse_My_Bellicosity
("A litany of complaints is not a plan." -- G.W. Bush, regarding Sen. Kerry's lack of vision)
To: TigerLikesRooster
"...has top speed 30 knots per hour..." Translation problem. It should say "top speed of 30 knots". You don't say "knots per hour."
20 posted on
06/29/2005 5:43:43 PM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: TigerLikesRooster
In order for them to get this done this fast, it's got to be the Varyag - they just resumed work on it again.
I sure hope that they get the Russians to help them in their carrier ops.....When the US Navy did carrier ops with the Russians it took the Russians 8 HOURS to empty the deck, while our guys did it in 45 minutes.
Landings? NOT. The Russian's most experienced pilot - the commander - refused to do the on deck landing, and went to shore. Of course the rest followed.
21 posted on
06/29/2005 5:45:17 PM PDT by
datura
(Molon Labe)
To: TigerLikesRooster
LOL, this is the cover story for why they are moving the shipyard:
http://english.people.com.cn/200308/13/eng20030813_122230.shtml
"Old Chinese Shipyard to Make Way for 2010 Shanghai World Expo Site
A Shanghai shipyard with more than 130 years of history is being moved to make way for 2010 Shanghai World Expo, said the China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC) Tuesday.
A Shanghai shipyard with more than 130 years of history is being moved to make way for 2010 Shanghai World Expo, said the China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC) Tuesday.
Shanghai city has decided to rebuild the Huangpu River frontagewhere the Jiangnan Shipyard is now located now into a modern business and residential area for the expo.
The city will build a new shipyard at Changxing island near themouth of the Yangtze River as a new home for Jiangnan Shipyard..."
To: TigerLikesRooster
ahm most us here were waiting for it ever since they have towed back russian carrier to reengineer
33 posted on
06/29/2005 5:54:38 PM PDT by
Flavius
("... we should reconnoitre assiduosly... " Vegetius)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Don't know how successful the first generation of Chinese carriers will be, but thanks to rats, the floodgates to our universities have been wide open for 30 years and we've trained two generations (thousands and thousands of people) of Chinese scientists and engineers how best to kill Americans.
Hey . . . I've got a great democrat idea! . . . let's train hundreds and hundreds of muslims in nuclear physics!!! Oh, never mind, we're already doing that.
To: TigerLikesRooster
How impressed do you think Chinese folks will be watching their Carrier sink in its harbor?
38 posted on
06/29/2005 5:58:55 PM PDT by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: TigerLikesRooster
We can only hope that they used the French marine architects in designing the flight deck.
49 posted on
06/29/2005 6:04:25 PM PDT by
Redleg Duke
(Getting old sucks, but it is the only viable option!)
To: TigerLikesRooster; All
How many planes do our largest carriers carry?
50 posted on
06/29/2005 6:05:10 PM PDT by
Quix
(LOVE NEVER FAILS.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson