Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China tells U.S. not to meddle in oil deal
Middle East North America Financial Network ^ | June 29, 2005 | UPI

Posted on 06/29/2005 8:15:49 AM PDT by spycatcher

BEIJING, June 29 (UPI) -- China expressed opposition to interference in a government-controlled oil company's bid for the U.S.-based oil company Unocal, state media said Wednesday.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao said that China National Offshore Oil Corporation's $18.5 billion offer for Unocal was "normal commercial activity between enterprises."

Liu said "economic cooperation between China and the U.S. serves the interests of both sides and commercial activities should not be interfered in or disturbed by political elements."

There are growing concerns in Washington over the deal as some U.S. officials are uncomfortable with CNOOC, 70 percent owned by the Chinese government, controlling a major player in the U.S. energy sector.

Sino-U.S. commercial ties are strained on a variety of fronts as China emerges as major economic power, including a massive trade imbalance, widespread copyright and intellectual property infringements plus accusations the country manipulates its currency.

Xinhua reported Wednesday that CNOOC Chief Executive Fu Chengyu is heading to the United States for negotiations and to dispel concerns over the deal.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chicoms; china; freetraitors; ingrates; oil; takeover; unocal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-256 next last

1 posted on 06/29/2005 8:15:50 AM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: spycatcher

response; US to China: kiss off!


2 posted on 06/29/2005 8:16:29 AM PDT by CGVet58 (God has granted us Liberty, and we owe Him Courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher

F**k China.


3 posted on 06/29/2005 8:16:42 AM PDT by RockinRight (Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CGVet58
THE AXIS OF OIL: China and Russia find a new way to advance their strategic ambitions
4 posted on 06/29/2005 8:17:33 AM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher

Bush will be only to eager to bend over.


5 posted on 06/29/2005 8:18:15 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher

We are nuts if we let this go through.


6 posted on 06/29/2005 8:18:15 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher

and Americans continue supporting the Chicoms by buying MADE IN CHINA goods...
you figure it out!


7 posted on 06/29/2005 8:18:20 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Sure it is just a normal deal. All the oil that Unocal provides would go to China, making the supply even shorter here.


8 posted on 06/29/2005 8:18:32 AM PDT by Ingtar (Understanding is a three-edged sword : your side, my side, and the truth in between ." -- Kosh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CGVet58
WAY to late for that. We have sold our soul to China.
The first time in history (that I am aware of) that a major world power willingly decided that they were tire of that position and handed the reigns over to their enemy.

Cordially,
GE
9 posted on 06/29/2005 8:19:48 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
"economic cooperation between China and the U.S. serves the interests of both sides and commercial activities should not be interfered in or disturbed by political elements."

ummm would that interference include a government controlled agency buying a private company in another nation?

10 posted on 06/29/2005 8:20:05 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (I musta taken a wrong turn at 198.182.159.17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Why do we continue to put up with this?

You know what we should do? FR should nominate one Freeper from each state to run for Senate, and at least a few House candidates...let's see just how powerful we can be!


11 posted on 06/29/2005 8:20:13 AM PDT by RockinRight (Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher

Deals with companies owned by repressive governments do not constitute "normal commercial activity between enterprises."


12 posted on 06/29/2005 8:21:30 AM PDT by dfwgator (Congratulations Longhorns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

The Freeper Party. I like the sound of that.


13 posted on 06/29/2005 8:22:10 AM PDT by dfwgator (Congratulations Longhorns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher

Interesting. A communist country wants to separate politics from commerce when it's to their benefit. I wonder if talking out of both sides of their mouth at the same time is painful?


14 posted on 06/29/2005 8:23:05 AM PDT by contemplator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Just read China Inc, and I recommend it. Seems like China recognizes no laws.


15 posted on 06/29/2005 8:24:07 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
"Sure it is just a normal deal. All the oil that Unocal provides would go to China, making the supply even shorter here."

Oil is a globally traded commodity. Any oil China takes from a purchase of Unocal is oil that China doesn't buy on the global market, which in turn is oil the U.S. can buy.

Not that I approve of the Chinese government (or indeed any foreign government) owning a company in the U.S.
16 posted on 06/29/2005 8:24:36 AM PDT by Moral Hazard (...but when push comes to shove, you've got to do what you love, even if it's not a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
excerpt from the Axis of Oil article:

China clearly aims to position itself as an alternative to America as an ally and armorer of countries that oppose U.S. foreign policy. Amy Myers Jaffe, a fellow at the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University, told the New York Times that the Chinese "tend toward countries where the U.S. has sanctions like Sudan, Iran and Iraq." She might have added that China also tends towards countries that are key suppliers of the oil that keeps the wheels of American commerce turning.

China is not confining the extension of its influence to the Middle East. The Western Hemisphere is also in its sights. Canadian prime minister Paul Martin just visited Beijing and came away with a broad-ranging deal to cooperate in a wide variety of energy projects, including plans for a pipeline and ports that would allow as much as one million barrels per day of oil from Alberta's tar sands to move to Canada's west coast for export to China. That's one-third of the oil that America has been hoping might in the future be available to it from Canada's tar sands. And, as always, there was more to the deal than a mere commercial transaction between consenting nations. According to their joint communiqué, the Strategic Working Group set up by Canada and China will not only broaden their energy relationship. In addition, in what can only be a shot at Washington, "Canada and China share the view that the United Nations and other multilateral institutions have an essential role to play in the development of a peaceful, prosperous and sustainable world." Little wonder that American officials have announced that they are "monitoring the talks," diplomatese for "sweating profusely."

In Latin America, China has made a series of oil deals that extend its influence, and must have James Monroe spinning in his grave. President Hu Jintao has agreed to invest $100 billion in Latin America in a variety of energy-related and other partnerships, as Latin American countries "try to lessen their trade dependence on the U.S.," according to reports in the Wall Street Journal. Most threatening is the arrangement made with Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez, a man with close ties to Fidel Castro and who claims his country is under "a new U.S. imperialist attack." China has agreed to invest over $400 million in Venezuela's oil and gas industry, and to buy 120,000 barrels of that country's fuel oil each month. Chávez had made it known that he plans to use the proceeds of his oil industry to fund sales of cheap oil to Castro, and he has not denied rumors that he plans to finance revolutionary groups in other Latin American countries....

17 posted on 06/29/2005 8:25:08 AM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

"Bush will be only to eager to bend over."

You have experience in this area?


18 posted on 06/29/2005 8:25:12 AM PDT by jbstrick (insert clever tagline here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher

US to China: Don't meddle with our buddy, Taiwan.


19 posted on 06/29/2005 8:25:19 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Bush is terribly WEAK on these kinds of issues, so don't hold your breath FReepers for the administration to block this.

The outcome of this is a litmus test for what kind of pres we actually have.
20 posted on 06/29/2005 8:26:08 AM PDT by aspiring.hillbilly (The Confederate States of America rises again...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-256 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson