Posted on 06/28/2005 7:29:53 PM PDT by churchillbuff
Yeah he was a self-promoting wannabee too. And since my meeting has started I have to say have a good day. Oh,and it's not at a pizza shop.
And now let's return this thread to the topic. You do recall it was about the Terri book, don't you?
Wow. You have a meeting. I'm sorry I didn't realize how important you are. Well, go break a leg. Really.
Not "ABSOLUTELY ZERO", rather room temparature. For a murder, the body is prime evidene.
There is NO evidence that TS's collapse was due to attempted homicide. NONE.
As to the murder -- we all saw that happen in real time. We all all witnesses -- via news reports.
Are you thinking of keeping any promises?
Completely illogical. It is "evidence" only of the fact that she collapsed. It is NOT evidence of foul play. There IS no evidence of foul play. You are spinning a murder conspiracy out of whole cloth.
Don't you think that everyone really knows that already?
Doug,
I heard that Mr. Fuhrman is considering a book about Vince Foster's "suicide."
Do you know anything about that?
You take that case and bring him to conviction upon prosecution. All with the evidence that there was a 30-40 min timeline in which he might have been able to dial 911 15 years ago. With no way to prove when she really died, it would be awfully difficult.
Look -- in a murder investigation it is very helpful to have the body. And in an attempted murder -- some evidence of a person coming close to death. Here, Terri's collapse is that evidence. The collapse is not sufficient evidence, but it is a strong piece of evidence itself, since it is unexplained. That "unexplained" is usually translated as suspicious, especially when circumstances such has Micheal's later murderous promise-keeping, and the his excessive odometer angst are included.
No, they don't.
All I heard is the rumor.
No, despite your illogical attempts to make it so, it isn't.
A body is just a body. A collapse is just a collapse. Unless there is some EVIDENCE of FOUL PLAY. In this case, there is NONE. The fact that she collapsed, in and of itself, is evidence of nothing other than that she suffered cardiac arrest.
And in an attempted murder -- some evidence of a person coming close to death. Here, Terri's collapse is that evidence.
You really don't get it, do you? You are ASSUMING that it was an attempted murder, and then using the fact of her collapse as 'evidence'. This is an example of the logical fallacy known as the circular argument.
Sure they do.
Perhaps you should ask the poster what brought it up, whom I have kindly pinged for you.
The smearing of Detective Fuhrman.
She collapsed under suspicious circumstances since no cause has been found. That leaves the door wide open.
The fact that she collapsed, in and of itself, is evidence of nothing other than that she suffered cardiac arrest.
Spontaneous cardiac arrest? I think not.
She collapsed, period. You find the circumstances 'suspicious' because you have already prejudged MS as an abuser and attempted murderer. Aside from your unsubstantiated suspicions, there is NO evidence of foul play. NONE.
Spontaneous cardiac arrest? I think not.
It happens, even in young people.
Yes. She did. A healthy young woman collapsed the cause of which hasn't been found.
Aside from your unsubstantiated suspicions,
Your assumption. Where did I say he caused the collapse? I merely said it was suspicious. And it is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.