1 posted on
06/28/2005 2:07:51 PM PDT by
CHARLITE
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: CHARLITE
Pre-emptive strike, anyone??
3 posted on
06/28/2005 2:10:53 PM PDT by
RockinRight
(Conservatism is common sense, liberalism is just senseless.)
To: CHARLITE
They are confusing capability with intent.
It's obvious that China wants a superpower-level military to go along with what is rapidly becoming a superpower-level economy. It'd be surprising if they were not using all these hundreds of billions of dollars to build up their military.
That doesn't mean they are going to risk all their economic progress by going to war. China right now is just experiencing the great benefits of peaceful capatalism. Sure, it's possible they will decide for war, but they strike me as a pretty rational lot, for all their lack of democracy. This isn't some whacko middle eastern regime like Iran or a nutcase government like North Korea.
4 posted on
06/28/2005 2:12:56 PM PDT by
Altair333
(Stop illegal immigration: George Allen in 2008)
To: CHARLITE
At times I wonder if Gertz's unnamed Pentagon sources are the same janitors that Farah uses.
To: CHARLITE
China is, as one senior Indian Navy officer put it, "buying submarines and warships like groceries".
7 posted on
06/28/2005 2:16:10 PM PDT by
pabianice
To: CHARLITE
China will do nothing until after the 2008 Olympics.
8 posted on
06/28/2005 2:16:27 PM PDT by
So Cal Rocket
(Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
To: CHARLITE
Any of you ever read that Clancy book, The Bear and the Dragon?
If China's Navy has increased it's combat power by 1000%, then that means it would last a day against the United States Navy, as opposed to an hour. And I suspect Air Force and Navy fighter pilots could quickly inflict helacious damage to their air forces as well.
10 posted on
06/28/2005 2:20:16 PM PDT by
JamesP81
To: CHARLITE
The U.S. should not got to war with China to defend Taiwan. It is not our job to defend everyone who is threatened.
13 posted on
06/28/2005 2:24:53 PM PDT by
mlo
To: CHARLITE
Beijing is hosting the Olympics then. They will wait until after that if they invade at all. I don't think they will.
To: CHARLITE
The obvious choice is to equip Taiwan with nukes. And a lot of 'em. An amphibious assualt won't mean squat as Beijing is vaporized.
18 posted on
06/28/2005 2:30:13 PM PDT by
Desecrated
(A nickel of every tax dollar should go toward the defense of America)
To: CHARLITE
2007 or so?
That sounds about right.
Just before a US presidential election and they'd do anything to make the Republicans look bad so that they can get their friends and compatriots the Democrats back in the White House. I'm sure they're already working out deals with Hillary.
20 posted on
06/28/2005 2:31:30 PM PDT by
Ghost of Philip Marlowe
(Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
To: CHARLITE
This war brought to you by cheaper prices and American jobs-thank you for shopping Wal Mart.
To: A. Pole; MarMema; Mount Athos; Lion in Winter; RusIvan; YoungCorps; OldCorps; FairOpinion; ...
Ping
U.S. officials have said two likely targets for China are the Russian Far East, which has vast oil and gas deposits, and Southeast Asia, which also has oil and gas resources.
25 posted on
06/28/2005 2:41:26 PM PDT by
GarySpFc
(Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
To: CHARLITE
28 posted on
06/28/2005 2:46:07 PM PDT by
malia
(President Bush - a man of honor!! clinton as President a man of horror)
To: CHARLITE
""There's a growing consensus that at some point in the mid-to-late '90s, there was a fundamental shift in the sophistication, breadth and re-sorting of Chinese defense planning,""
I wonder how that came about? NOT!
To: CHARLITE
according to one Pentagon study We need a Pentagon study to tell us this? China has been all over Asia more than once and will be again. SSDD
34 posted on
06/28/2005 3:00:02 PM PDT by
RightWhale
(withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
To: CHARLITE
If there is a war before or even in 2008-what does happen to the Olympics?
36 posted on
06/28/2005 3:01:44 PM PDT by
WestVirginiaRebel
(Carnac: A siren, a baby and a liberal. Answer: Name three things that whine.)
To: CHARLITE
For China to conduct an amphibious assault against land, air and Naval resistance, now that would be an impressive battle. There would be a lot of good fish habitat offshore.
38 posted on
06/28/2005 3:13:34 PM PDT by
Plutarch
To: CHARLITE
A former co-worker of mine was a Chinese citizen with a Ph.D. One time we were discussing Taiwan and I asked her by what right China could justify taking over Taiwan and why this was considered a national priority. Her answer was that this was justified because the people in Taiwan are of the same race (Han nationality). She agreed that, by the same token, China did not have any right to annex Tibet because the Tibetans are a different race.
To: CHARLITE
Great read. I've been saying this for years, I hope others and this administration start waking up before it's too late.
46 posted on
06/28/2005 4:05:12 PM PDT by
SirAllen
(Liberalism*2 = Communism)
To: CHARLITE
"There's a growing consensus that at some point in the mid-to-late '90s, there was a fundamental shift in the sophistication, breadth and re-sorting of Chinese defense planning," said Richard LawlessLet's stop and review history a bit before everyone forgets and blames this dangerous state of affairs on Bushitler and the GOP...
Who was President at that time the entire effort changed direction and speed? And who was selling missile and satillite technologies to China for campaign contributions? And who purposely opened the nuclear secrets of Los Alamos up to the Chinese and who allowed them to steal our nuclear warhead technologies?
These chickens have been coming home to roost for a long time. Let's not forget who hatched them in the first place! The same crew is planning on coming back for the third and fourth acts (the final ones) in 2008 and 2012.
48 posted on
06/28/2005 4:14:31 PM PDT by
Gritty
("Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder" - Arnold Toynbee)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson