[theodorelogan]

There is nothing inconsistant with taking the property of a man who took yours. You may as well say I don't have the right to shoot someone who shot me...after all, I cannot deny a man his rights just because he denies me mine?

Of course I can. This taking of Souters home is perfectly justified.

[Tribune7]

Something else to remember. This WILL help the town. It will bring tourists and give them an world-famous landmark. Further it appears to have an educational aspect to it.

It certainly falls within the logic of the Kelso decision.

[Temple Owl]

Of course I can. This taking of Souters home is perfectly justified.

Absolutely! The Supreme Court has spoken.