Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stephen Spielberg's "Balanced" View of Terror
Front Page Magazine ^ | June 28, 2005 | Debbie Schlussel

Posted on 06/28/2005 7:12:34 AM PDT by kromike

Stephen Spielberg's "Balanced" View of Terror By Debbie Schlussel FrontPageMagazine.com | June 28, 2005

Much is being made about Steven Spielberg's upcoming inaccurate, revisionist history and "balance" (code for morally equivocating Islamic terrorists with their victims) in his new film, Vengeance -- about the Israeli Mossad's tracking down of Palestinian terrorists who murdered Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics. But anyone who knows the history of this movie, based on a George Jonas book of the same name, should not be surprised.

Jonas admits he has only one "source" for most of the information in his book and that many of the incidents could not be verified. Many of his "facts" were refuted by testimony in a Norwegian trial of Mossad agents who were caught accidentally killing a Moroccan waiter there. Spielberg has not contacted anyone in the Mossad, the Israeli government, or the agents who were involved in the operation, some of whom discredited Jonas' book.

As I wrote in a column on Spielberg's Vengeance, last summer, Spielberg halted production to avoid upsetting terrorists during the Olympics. Just out of respect and "sensitivity" for terrorists' wishes. Then, Spielberg realized this was a bad P.R. move and had his publicist claim the reason was something almost as absurd, but much less believable: that Spielberg was just too upset each day--sobbing while reading pages of the script--to continue. Right, and the sob-scenes in E.T. also made him halt production. Not.

One wonders if Spielberg's "balance" will involve visiting the family of Cleveland-based parents of David Berger, the handsome, American-born, Israeli Olympic weight-lifter, who was among the murdered athletes. Don't count on it. The film, starring the outspokenly pro-Palestinian Ben Kingsley, is bound to be no different than the "balanced" Oscar-winning documentary, "One Day in September," which -- as I wrote in another column -- showed the murder of the Israeli Olympic athletes from the victims' families' and Palestinian terrorists' points of view--as an action thriller.

Spielberg's "Vengeance," appears to be an indictment of our current War on Terror. According to Reuters, Daniel Craig, who stars in the film, told an entertainment magazine that "it's about how vengeance doesn't...work -- blood breeds blood." The one accidental assassination -- of the Moroccan waiter in Norway -- is being used to discredit the entire operation, which was a successful War on Terror. There will always be accidental deaths in fighting terror, but that does not mean there should not be a strong and swift response to it.

Don't hold your breath for real balance, such as Spielberg visiting terror-host state Syria (on the State Department's terrorist list) to interrogate and film Jamil Al-Gashey, the only surviving murderer of the Israeli Olympic athletes. He enjoys a life of safety and freedom under the protection of Syria's government, where he moved because, as he said, he didn't want his daughter to grow up without a father. No biggie that he killed the fathers of several daughters of the Israeli athletes. Don't look for any of that in "Fighting Terror is a Bad Idea, as Told by Steven Spielberg."

Question: Why did Spielberg make the Nazis look bad, and even melt to their deaths, in "Raiders by the Lost Ark"? Where was the balance then?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hollywood; moviereview; spielberg; vengeance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: sheik yerbouty

SS veils his preoductions in secrecy. There's not much that gets out and certainly not enough to make assertions like the ones Schlussel was making. Again if I'm wrong when I see the movie I'll admit it. I'd bet the farm I'm not though.


61 posted on 06/28/2005 8:17:00 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty

Not knowing the meaning of "kapo", I had to google it. The Wiesenthal site describes it in such dark terms. I don't know if the spielster is willing to become one of them.


62 posted on 06/28/2005 8:19:28 AM PDT by Vision Thing (Hillary is a mad cow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: kromike

Destined to be a liberal cult classic.


63 posted on 06/28/2005 8:21:48 AM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Very disappointing to hear you, of all people, adopt this view which is the same complaint people have about that film on various white power sites. Is that really what you think?

I think that Palestinian terror is viewed with tolerance by liberal elites and considered to be morally ambivalent by Hollywood because it is a Third World movement by "oppressed minorities."

It is controversial in Hollywood to portray "oppressed minorities" as evil - take for example The Sum Of All Fears in which the enemy is deArabized into acceptably demonizable Russian neo-Nazis. Or in Kingdom of Heaven when the enemy is really evil Europeans, etc., etc.

It's the same mentality that dribbles into real life, as when clues to the true identity of the DC snipers went unpublicized and the search was on for a disgruntled white conservative.

The phenomenon of self-hatred is alive and well in Hollywood.

64 posted on 06/28/2005 8:23:53 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: kromike

"One Day in September" is VERY anti the terrorists. It's a good movie. It's main point seems to be the utter incompetence of the vaunted German police/security forces. You must have some strange colored goggles on to miss the sympathy for the victims this movie demonstrates clearly and unmistakably.


65 posted on 06/28/2005 8:25:22 AM PDT by Charlesj (I'd gladly fire Drier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Tenuous connections, indeed.

From her previous article on this film: Spielberg halted production "because he didn’t want to anger and incite terrorists." Meaning incite them to attack the Olympics that were ongoing at the time.

Cowardly? Yeah, maybe. "Halted production to avoid upsetting terrorists"? That makes him sound like a co-conspirator. It's a pretty vicious smear.

This article is easily as bad as the worst liberal tripe out there. There are plenty of things that Debbie could criticize Spielberg for, if she has an axe to grind (and clearly she does) - but this is a big, big stretch.


66 posted on 06/28/2005 8:26:04 AM PDT by sbelew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Charlesj

It's from Schlussel's column. I've seen ODIS and don't know what she's talking about either.


67 posted on 06/28/2005 8:26:44 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: sbelew
In the past, she's apparently made the assertion that anyone who likes Soccer is a crypto terrorist sympathizer since its a lot more popular in those countries then here. Can you imagine Mark Steyn writing something like this?
68 posted on 06/28/2005 8:28:40 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing

Time will tell..


69 posted on 06/28/2005 8:28:47 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Borges

We'll know when it comes out.


70 posted on 06/28/2005 8:29:30 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: kromike

When Elia Kazan received a standing ovation for his Lifetime Achievement Oscar, in 1999, there were some who remained seated and wouldn't applaud, such as Ed Harris, Nick Nolte and Richard Dreyfuss, and some who didn't have the balls to take a stand, so they remained seated but applauded, such as steven spielberg.


71 posted on 06/28/2005 8:33:48 AM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ampat

And Warren Beatty of all people gave Kazan a standing ovation. Kazan gave Beatty his big break.


72 posted on 06/28/2005 8:35:13 AM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: demnomo

IF they palis kill one of thier own colaterally, they just figure if he was holy he'll go to heaven and if he was not who cares anyway. And if it's a woman or an infidel or a jew, all the better.


73 posted on 06/28/2005 8:43:50 AM PDT by johnb838 (Adios, liberal mofos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kromike
I remember reading of Golda Maier (then prime minister) telling the hit squad - "no innocents, and make sure the others know why they are being killed." Tough lady. We need someone like her at Gitmo.
74 posted on 06/28/2005 9:17:48 AM PDT by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnb838

Sad, but true. I totally lost all respect for the Palis when they ghoulishly danced for joy and passed out sweets on 9/11. Their culture appears to be filled with hatred, murder, lies, emotion vs logic, blood-thirsty violence, child-sacrificing, more lies and deluded thinking...


75 posted on 06/28/2005 11:55:28 AM PDT by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson