Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nathan Zachary

Then does this mean we don't have to pay the taxes that pay their salaries. We pay for the service of protection etc. If the police have no duty to protect us, then just exactly what should we expect them to do? I think these Judges have suddenly dropped 40 points of their IQ


2 posted on 06/28/2005 1:51:21 AM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marty60

No, you pay for law enforcement, not protection. It is every ones responsibility to protect themselves, their property and family.


4 posted on 06/28/2005 1:58:28 AM PDT by eastforker (Under Cover FReeper going dark(too much 24))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: marty60

I haven't a clue. You'd think that if you hire and pay them to provide a service, you should recieve that service.
I guess this will rebound thru the whole business world as well. City trash collectors; it has no end!


5 posted on 06/28/2005 1:58:49 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: marty60

I don't want them to protect me, giving them that role allows them to control me.


25 posted on 06/28/2005 3:25:09 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (LET ME DIE ON MY FEET IN MY SWAMP, ALEX KOZINSKI FOR SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: marty60
If the police have no duty to protect us, then just exactly what should we expect them to do?

I thought police took an oath "to protect and serve"?

40 posted on 06/28/2005 4:26:55 AM PDT by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson