Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas (80mph!), Iowa (70), Indiana(70) Raise Maximum Speed Limit
http://www.thenewspaper.com ^ | 6/20/05 | not stated

Posted on 06/27/2005 8:37:42 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat

Drivers in Texas, Iowa, and Indiana will enjoy higher speed limits next month as legislation raising the top speeds on rural roads takes effect.

On Friday, Texas Governor Rick Perry (R) signed HB 2257 into law making 80 MPH the maximum allowable speed in the state. Rural portions of I-10 and I-20 will enjoy the new top speed, while other rural roads could see the limit rise to 75 MPH. Both the state House and Senate adopted the legislation without opposition last month.

On July 1, a law signed by Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack (D) creating a 70 MPH speed limit goes into effect. This new limit better reflects the actual speed of cars on rural highways which averages 69.8 MPH according to sensors embedded into the pavement.

In May, Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels (R) signed SB 217 into law raising the maximum limit from 65 MPH to 70 MPH in areas with less than 50,000 population. The law also raises the limit for trucks from 60 to 65 MPH, and gives a 10 MPH boost to several roads currently posted at 55 MPH. The state will begin placing the higher-limit signs on July 5.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewspaper.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Indiana; US: Iowa; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: automobile; car; driving; hooligan; motorcycle; speedlimit; truck; yeehaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281 next last
To: uglybiker
Once you get to New Mexico, the speed limit's 75. Which is good. There's alotta nuthin' in New Mexico. ;-)

And it's a good thing it's 75, since I'm going to be driving from Amarillo to Flagstaff during day 4 of my trip. I will definitely be enjoying those high speeds!

41 posted on 06/27/2005 9:00:51 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Deport them all; let Fox sort them out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MHT

I'll bet you $10 they won't; let's give it five years and settle it then.


42 posted on 06/27/2005 9:02:48 PM PDT by Old Professer (As darkness is the absence of light, evil is the absence of good; innocence is blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

I guess I should have said I normally only go 5 over.

It is very rare for me to try 10, but I did the other day...but I was looking for those lights in my rear view.


43 posted on 06/27/2005 9:02:59 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MHT

It's 400 miles from Dallas to Amarillo. much of it on roads that are empty. Besides, the German Autobahen used to have no speed limit but there were not an extraordinary number of deaths. You have a point aboiut the trucks. But the big problem is their speeding in urban areas.


44 posted on 06/27/2005 9:03:21 PM PDT by RobbyS (chirho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
yea and MOST cars fit that description....

I said most modern cars e.g. built in the last ten years will give you optimal fuel economy in the 70-75 MPH range. Everyone gears it that way and most modern engines can pull it off. Except for grossly under-powered vehicles, it really does not matter what you are driving. I was just giving an example I am familiar with because I've had more than one car in that power range with detailed real-time fuel efficiency data.

45 posted on 06/27/2005 9:03:42 PM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

Anyone who rides motorcycles knows how wind resistance starts increasing significantly as soon as you get above 50mph or so. I prefer "increased fuel use" which is a fact as opposed to "waste gas" which is an opinion. :)


46 posted on 06/27/2005 9:03:51 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Hell is driving on a Missouri road. Rocky and they never keep up the roads it seems until they are about to fall apart.

Ever driven Jamaica Avenue in Queens? Or the Cross Bronx Expressway? Almost bad enough to be considered "off roading."

47 posted on 06/27/2005 9:03:56 PM PDT by Petronski (Be alert! The world needs more lerts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Peace will be here soon
I am afraid some people will think it will now be safe to do 85-90 with an 80 MPH speed limit

Someone else who thinks government needs to be a nanny?

I could go 100mph through many parts of Nebraska and South Dakota that I drive once in awhile, but don't.

It isn't speed limits that cause problems on the roadways, it is lack of driver training. A LOT of people don't know the simple rules of the road (Keep right except to pass, etc).

48 posted on 06/27/2005 9:04:50 PM PDT by xrp (Fox News Channel should rename itself the Missing Persons Network)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

I don't like Sebelius, but that is dang funny.


49 posted on 06/27/2005 9:04:57 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Besides, the German Autobahen used to have no speed limit but there were not an extraordinary number of deaths.

I saw a TV show not too long ago which pointed out that there are still no-speed-limit zones on the Autobahn. The Autobahn isn't one big no-speed-limit zone anymore, however.

50 posted on 06/27/2005 9:05:38 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Deport them all; let Fox sort them out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

I can only imagine...


51 posted on 06/27/2005 9:06:03 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Note that Arizona is 75 too. Cut my Santa Fé to Los Angeles time by 6 hours.


52 posted on 06/27/2005 9:06:58 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

"Explain how the autobahn is one of the safest roads in the world despite no speed limit at all?"

This is kind of a tricky question. I know it wasn`t directed at me, but I can`t help myself here.

The Autobahn is very well maintained , that in itself makes it a safer road to travel. It is much different than the highways in the U.S.. Most to all Germans who travel it kind of know the rules and follow them fairly well. When you have cars traveling at very high rates of speed coming up behind you, you tend to pay attention. The Autobahn is also well policed and there are stiff penalties for doing the wrong thing.

Unlike our highways, which are crap , and people act like idiots because they do not respect other drivers.

So comparing our highways to the Autobahn is really not a good comparison, IMO.


53 posted on 06/27/2005 9:07:16 PM PDT by Peace will be here soon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Socratic
This means that people will spend less time getting to where they want to go - thus saving gas!

Yes. Boston to San Fran in my '91 Vette. 28 mpg. The 325i does it at around 32 mpg. The gas cry-babies need to look at their income tax returns and the fuel taxes, before whining.

54 posted on 06/27/2005 9:08:14 PM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tortoise

Seems to me most "cars" on the roads are pickups, minivans, and SUV's... I would like to see a fuel efficiency test redone with newer cars.


55 posted on 06/27/2005 9:08:30 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz
I used to go to Mainz quite often for work. I was driving with traffic going 140kph in snow flurries. Needless to say that was a white knuckle drive.

I was actually driving back from Klobenz. I drove from Mainz to Koblenz along the river. Best road trip I have ever made.

56 posted on 06/27/2005 9:09:29 PM PDT by dc27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mvpel

i would venture to guess that with no speed limit, especially in more rural ares, people tend to drive according to their driving abilities -- which in some cases may be lower than what the posted speed may have been.

by stating the speed "limit" as 65, people (i.e. older people, people with distractions, people with limited coordination, etc.) tend to try and get as close to the speed "limit" as possible even if they should only be driving 40.

...just a thought.


57 posted on 06/27/2005 9:10:03 PM PDT by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Peace will be here soon

some good points


58 posted on 06/27/2005 9:10:04 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
Under good driving conditions, 80 is not too fast at all.

As long as you're actually driving and not just occupying the left front seat. At 80 mph, driving should have your full attention, because if anything goes wrong you have very little time to recover. I like to get where I'm going, too, and drive with the flow of traffic for the most part, which seems the safest option.

In North Dakota they raised the limit from 70 to 75 a year or so ago, but said they would enforce it and they do. In my opinion it's safer because instead of one person driving 60 and another driving 80 pretty much everyone sets their cruise control at 74 and traffic moves along without much drama.
59 posted on 06/27/2005 9:11:21 PM PDT by JayNorth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

They could raise the limit on our roads all they want. Our vehicles would just bounce off the pavement into the ditch all the quicker.


60 posted on 06/27/2005 9:12:29 PM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson