Posted on 06/27/2005 5:22:48 PM PDT by kristinn
The lack of independence among USSR states was in large part a result of their capture and rapid subjugation by Stalin in WWII, and AFAIK had little to do with the supremacy of their ideological unity.
I think that only a small minority of anti-war people want dictatorial power. But perhaps it’s a majority among their leadership depending on how that’s defined. My sense is that most are just emotionally disturbed, misguided and acting out and want the easy answers and salvation that the left promises to the harsh realities that they can’t or won’t face. I suspect that most would love a far left version of the US, with a trendy progressive interpretation of the Constitution that protected them, even if it meant our standard of living went into freefall, but with them immune of course.
It’s those people that I’m concerned about because their message is persuasive. I think that the hard core US haters are generally counter productive and self destruct, as long as they’re forced to expose themselves like this.
No, not extreme. You advocate reasonable measures in a time of war.
Appears these people have declared war on the US. Time to trot out those anti sedition laws and try em for treason.
Following is the text of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1546, adopted unanimously June 8, which:
1)- endorses the new interim government of Iraq,
2) - allows the multinational force to provide security in partnership with the new government,
3) - sets out a leading role for the U.N. in helping the political process over the next year,
4) - and calls upon the international community to aid Iraq in its transition:
You did remember correctly. This resolution renders these lunatics even more irrelevant.
OH ... is not the beach in Santa Monica PUBLIC LAND???
Wouldn't want to breach the bogus law regarding "separation of church and state" would they?
Yes, in fact it's well known as "The People's Republic of Santa Monica."
See, we don't sue when they do stuff like that. Maybe we should...
Tell that to "Brian," who answers the phone at Senator Orrin Hatch's D.C. office. I phoned all senators to demand censure and expulsion of Turban Durbin, and "Brian" tried to argue with me that "we can't censor [sic] someone for 'controversial' remarks."
I replied that there's a difference between being "controversial" and being a "traitor," and Durbin definitely crossed that line.
Speaking of the 'enemy within,' it was discouraging to encounter "Brian's" attitude in a Republican senator's office.
I'm finding out this year that it matters not whether there is an (R) or a (D) behind someone's name, but what they really think on the important issues.. everyone's gonna get judged on their own merits from now on..
Some of those who support the war, too, seem to have only discovered their compassion for the Iraqis now that we have taken it upon ourselves to fight Saddam, but to me that's a case of waking up to a wrong we should have corrected long ago and acting in our best interest; the "peace" folks, on the other hand, claim this selfless passion for "innocents" just as someone is actually HELPING their situation.
The "peace" brigades are only interested in victims if their victim status can somehow be linked to US wrongdoing, no matter how crazy the link. I wonder if any of these dopes ever thinks about that. Of course, first they'd have to think...
I think filing suits against them is the only way to stop this nonsense.
I also think it is time "we the people" sued the government for using taxpayer money to provide korans, beads, rugs and all the rest of the crap, citing the old separation of church and state, public ground mantra. Especially after the 10 commandments ruling by our judicial masters yesterday.
But you can sure as heck remove them from positions ala Trent Lott.
TurbanDurbin still needs to be censured followed by resignation or expulsion, IMO.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." - Winston Churchill
The full text of resolution 1546 (2004) reads as follows:
“The Security Council,
“Welcoming the beginning of a new phase in Iraq’s transition to a democratically elected government, and looking forward to the end of the occupation and the assumption of full responsibility and authority by a fully sovereign and independent Interim Government of Iraq by 30 June 2004
I've been present several times when a leftist's referred to the "occupation," and have said; "There is no 'occupation,' it ended last June." On each occasion the leftist has afforded a happy (if not uncommon) opportunity to dumbfound by asking; "Who says so?".
So, these "anti-war activists" aren't anti-war activists afterall. In fact, just the opposite.
On each occasion the leftist has afforded a happy (if not uncommon) opportunity to dumbfound by asking; "Who says so?".
Aw c'mon...I'm waiting with bat breath for your reply. ;*)
ping.
I think you mean sympathy for the terrorists.
I share the sentiment.
Go figure, the antiwar people turn pro-guerrilla-warfare... are we surprised?
I say send them all there for a free 3 month vacation. I am sure we can generate enough funding to send these smelly hippies to the middle east. Let them stay there for a few months and see if they don't have a life changing experience.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.