Posted on 06/27/2005 6:51:27 AM PDT by RobFromGa
RULINGS ON MONDAY?
A look at the remaining cases of the Supreme Court's term:
TEN COMMANDMENTS: The constitutionality of Ten Commandments in public buildings and on government property, under the First Amendment's ban on an ''establishment'' of religion.
FILE SHARING: Whether the entertainment industry may sue technology manufacturers over consumers who use their products to steal music and movies online.
INTERNET ACCESS: A test of the tight control cable companies hold over high-speed Internet service in a case that will determine whether the industry must open up its lines to competitors.
DEATH PENALTY: A look at courts' flexibility to reopen cases, in an appeal that asks if an appeals court was wrong to order more study of a Tennessee Death Row inmate's claims.
RESTRAINING ORDERS: Whether police can be sued for how they enforce restraining orders.
(Excerpt) Read more at suntimes.com ...
Live thread...
FYI
Bump for later read.
do they release them all at once at 10am or one at a time during the day
bump
A scenario for Monday
| 02:05 PM | Lyle Denniston | Comments (0) | TrackBack (1)
Amid layer upon layer of uncertainty, one thing seems reasonably predictable about the Supreme Court's public session on Monday, the last public sitting of the current Term. That is that the Court will formally recess for the summer without a word being said about any retirement, or retirements, from the Court. Too much, however, can be read into that, and should not be.
At the end of the session, some observers new to the Court and sitting in the audience -- filled with a sense of expectation -- might think something is up after the last opinion is announced Monday. At that point, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist will begin a round of thank yous, primarily to the Court's staff for its work during the Term. That, however, very likely would not be a prelude to an announcement about his own plans.
There are several scenarios that may occur, but most of them reflect the traditional view of the Justices that the bench, itself, is not the place to announce a departure. A decision to end one's service is considered to be a highly personal, not an institutional, choice, so there is no action by the Court to be taken officially -- on the bench, or off of it. The only recent retirement announced from the bench was that of Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr.; Chief Justice Rehnquist did announce that from the bench, presumably at Powell's request.
There is no binding protocol on how a Justice quits, but there are some customs. With the understanding that this is not a firm prediction about the way Monday's events will go, here is one scenario that could play out that day.
The Justices will assemble behind the velvet curtains to the rear of the bench, a few minutes before 10, and shake hands all around. There may be some small talk, but the opinions of the day probably won't be mentioned -- unless someone exercises the rarely used option of calling back an opinion that is about ready to be announced. That is not likely. Almost certainly, no one in that intimate little gathering will be talking about the retirement question.
After the Court's Marshal annnounces the Justices, they will enter through the parted curtains, and take their seats. Rehnquist will announce that orders have been issued and will be released by the Clerk, and will then call on the junior Justice who has an opinion ready to announce. If normal practice prevails, the six opinions that are expected to be announced will be released by the Justices/authors in order of reverse seniority.
At that point on many decision days, the Court would admit some new members to its lawyers' bar, but that is not expected on Monday. Rehnquist will announce the end of the Term, and distribute the verbal thank yous. The Marshal will then rap the gavel, just off the bench to the right, and announce that the Court will stand in recess until the first Monday in October. The Justices will then leave the bench.
After that public session, the Court will hold a closed-door meeting, to deal with new pending cases that have not yet been acted upon. Those orders are likely to be announced the following morning, Tuesday, with the Court not in session.
Rehnquist would not have completed his duties for the Term until after the private session Monday.
If he is going to retire now, that would probably come in a simple statement released by the Court's public information office, probably after a short interval to allow the President to be notified first, perhaps by a hand-delivered letter. But that would not be likely until Monday afternoon, at the earliest. Rehnquist personally would not want to mix in his personal announcement with an official session of the Court.
If such an announcement does not come on Monday, that would not be conclusive proof that it would not happen later in the week, or some time over the summer. Rehnquist has kept his own counsel about what he may do, and even his colleagues do not seem to know.
The short piece of advice for the hordes waiting in the blogosphere and at the Court for an announcement on Monday is to wait patiently for something official; media speculation will not mean much.
.
...and for us political junkies, we are always in session.
Thanks for starting this thread.
BTTT
First Draft of End-of-Term Statistics
Posted by Tom Goldstein at 05:53 PM
Each year, we produce a variety of statistics on the Court's Term. This post includes the current version, which obviously will be updated to reflect the final six cases. In addition, we need to double check the numbers. Here are the voting relationships and the other statistics.
One set of numbers jumps out at me dramatically: the 5-4 alignments. This term will end with roughly 1/4 of the cases decided 5-4, which is about average. Almost without exception, approximately 1/2 of the 5-4 cases is decided by a majority composed of the Chief Justice and Justices O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas. This term, of the 17 cases decided so far that are 5-4 in whole or in part, only three were have been composed of that traditional conservative majority.
Although the alignments in this term's 5-4 cases are all over the map (with no Justice so far in fewer than eight 5-4 majorities or more than ten), this will (I think) be the first term in which there are fewer cases decided by the five most conservative Justices than by majorities composed of their four more liberal colleagues plus one of the conservatives. So far, the latter scenario has occurred five times -- twice with Justice O'Connor, twice with Justice Kennedy, and once with Justice Scalia.
Thanks for the ping....
Isn't there a case regarding abortion???
Here we go.
Today we will see just what other rights we will lose in this country.
Will they overturn betamax? Will they rule no Ten Commandments?
We will find out soon enough.
Patience is a virtue. Especially when I know the dreaded tickticktick of the impending doom clock alarm is about to go off at dem. headquarters.
There isn't an abortion case
FIRST RULING
Access to cable modem service denied
The Supreme Court ruled on Monday, by a 6-3 vote, that cable operators offering high-speed Internet access have no legal duty to open their service to customers of all Internet service providers.
Eventually somebody is going to die on the court as well, most likely one of the liberals.
When that happens, it will make a Rehnquist retirement look easy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.