Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mcg1969

There is a difference between leaving a pet to a person to be cared for under certain conditions and setting up a trust for one's pet (at least I think so). As much as a love my Eskie and my cat (well, I could take or leave her, actually), I'm not leaving them any money.

But if you're an elderly person with no family I can understand the need to want your pet cared for after you're gone.

It just seems odd that this had to be put into law this way.


19 posted on 06/25/2005 10:35:27 AM PDT by two134711 (If you're too open minded, your brains will fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: two134711

I have written several "pet trusts". Mostly for the elderly, whose pet is really their sole companion. You see, they get unconditional love from the pet, while many of them feel that nieces, nephews, children and grandchildren are just hanging around waiting for them to kick the bucket so they can get their hands on the loot!

Imagine their surprise when they find that the dearly departed left the bulk of her estate to various charities and a trust fund for Fifi with the residuary going to the SPCA after Fifi's demise!!!


23 posted on 06/25/2005 10:39:13 AM PDT by GatorGirl (God Bless Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson