Hey Michela!
HERE'S YOUR SIGN:
![](http://unattributed.net/assets/images/db_images/db_Image51.jpg)
1 posted on
06/25/2005 9:41:54 AM PDT by
SmithL
To: SmithL
I don't get it ... don't a lot of libbers smoke? Shouldn't there be a bunch of rallies and protests over this?
2 posted on
06/25/2005 9:54:03 AM PDT by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
To: SmithL; Ms Jeezlooweez
![](http://www.osmre.gov/gif/donotenter72.gif)
This sign works as well, I couldn't find a sign for Sodom and Gomorrah...Gee, I wonder why....
To: SmithL
Those who think socialist incrimentalism isn't a valid concern.
Think again.
Who in their right mind 20 years ago would have thought anybody, city or state would ban outside smoking would have been considered a little on the wacko side
7 posted on
06/25/2005 10:12:03 AM PDT by
Popman
(In politics, ideas are more important than individuals.)
To: SmithL
Get it? The nanny staters are running out of space for yet more signs telling everybody else what to do? Boo Hoo
To: SmithL
Can't smoke inside. Can't smoke outside. What are they going to do when people stop buying cigarettes and their (tax) revenue stream dries up??
12 posted on
06/25/2005 10:33:01 AM PDT by
Conservative Infidel
(How come they call it "Tourist Season" if we can't shoot them??)
To: SmithL
I don't like to be around smokers. Personally, I think--are you ready for this?--smokers really need help.
But I also believe that every smoker in SF ought to gather down on Market and Van Ness and light up, then dare the
local authorities to do something about it. I'd even go down and stand with them, coughing and hacking, I admit.
15 posted on
06/25/2005 10:56:47 AM PDT by
righttackle44
(The most dangerous weapon in the world is a Marine with his rifle and the American people behind him)
To: SmithL; SheLion; Just another Joe; CSM; Conspiracy Guy; Mears; metesky; Madame Dufarge; qam1; ...
"That's an outrage,'' Alioto-Pier said, adding that she had written Yomi Agunbiade, the department's acting general manager, a letter about the issue. "They're supposed to be implementing this next week. It's wholly irresponsible. " No madame supervisor - what is an outrage and totally irresponsible is the fact you introduced this idiocy in the first place .............
19 posted on
06/25/2005 11:07:17 AM PDT by
Gabz
(My give-a-damn is busted.)
To: SmithL
Will defecating on the city streets still be allowed? I sure hope so! Taking away that right would be absolutely intolerable. Maybe an ordinance can be passed that will allow that to take place on the City Hall steps instead.
To: SmithL
Yeah, you can't smoke cigarettes but if some couple had gay sex on the sidewalk I bet nobody would complain.
73 posted on
06/25/2005 2:18:13 PM PDT by
TheForceOfOne
(My tagline is currently being blocked by Congressional filibuster for being to harsh.)
To: SmithL
At some of the 250 parks and recreation areas under the department's control, there are already so many signs listing local laws that it may be difficult to add an additional "No Smoking" sign. LOL! Only in California.
78 posted on
06/25/2005 2:36:05 PM PDT by
Drew68
(IYAOYAS! Semper Gumby!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson