Skip to comments.
SAN FRANCISCO: No signs posted on eve of outdoor smoking ban
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 6/25/5
| Charlie Goodyear
Posted on 06/25/2005 9:41:53 AM PDT by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Hey Michela!
HERE'S YOUR SIGN:
1
posted on
06/25/2005 9:41:54 AM PDT
by
SmithL
To: SmithL
I don't get it ... don't a lot of libbers smoke? Shouldn't there be a bunch of rallies and protests over this?
2
posted on
06/25/2005 9:54:03 AM PDT
by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
To: SmithL; Ms Jeezlooweez

This sign works as well, I couldn't find a sign for Sodom and Gomorrah...Gee, I wonder why....
To: softwarecreator
I guess the pot heads get a pass.
4
posted on
06/25/2005 9:57:42 AM PDT
by
marty60
To: marty60
Yeah, guess so.
Next will be the banning of "overweight people", to be followed immediately by people who just aren't cute enough. Man, and they call us nazi's.
5
posted on
06/25/2005 10:00:13 AM PDT
by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
To: softwarecreator
commie/fascist/socialist/dums always think they have the RIGHT to tell other people what they can do and think.
6
posted on
06/25/2005 10:05:49 AM PDT
by
marty60
To: SmithL
Those who think socialist incrimentalism isn't a valid concern.
Think again.
Who in their right mind 20 years ago would have thought anybody, city or state would ban outside smoking would have been considered a little on the wacko side
7
posted on
06/25/2005 10:12:03 AM PDT
by
Popman
(In politics, ideas are more important than individuals.)
To: SmithL
Get it? The nanny staters are running out of space for yet more signs telling everybody else what to do? Boo Hoo
To: marty60
Yeah, they preach about rights and sensitivities, yet they try to take them away in the next breath.
9
posted on
06/25/2005 10:26:58 AM PDT
by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
To: softwarecreator
Their right to tell YOU how you are to live.
10
posted on
06/25/2005 10:30:10 AM PDT
by
marty60
To: marty60
Thankfully they are around to tell me how to live or I'd just screw the whole thing up.
11
posted on
06/25/2005 10:32:10 AM PDT
by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
To: SmithL
Can't smoke inside. Can't smoke outside. What are they going to do when people stop buying cigarettes and their (tax) revenue stream dries up??
12
posted on
06/25/2005 10:33:01 AM PDT
by
Conservative Infidel
(How come they call it "Tourist Season" if we can't shoot them??)
To: Conservative Infidel
Here in WI the state assembly just passed a state-wide smoking ban.
To: softwarecreator
software creator? HUMMM an innovator/original thinker......man your the enemy to these rag tag little fascist.
14
posted on
06/25/2005 10:55:28 AM PDT
by
marty60
To: SmithL
I don't like to be around smokers. Personally, I think--are you ready for this?--smokers really need help.
But I also believe that every smoker in SF ought to gather down on Market and Van Ness and light up, then dare the
local authorities to do something about it. I'd even go down and stand with them, coughing and hacking, I admit.
15
posted on
06/25/2005 10:56:47 AM PDT
by
righttackle44
(The most dangerous weapon in the world is a Marine with his rifle and the American people behind him)
To: Popman; Happygal; Allegra; Miss Behave; Howlin; Miss Marple; MotleyGirl70; Xenalyte; Lady Jag; ...
Those who think socialist incrimentalism isn't a valid concern. Think again. Not trying to be sexist here, but all of these socialist ideas and nostrums have been getting traction since women have achieved equality, or near-equality, in public life -- and most of them seem to have women as their chief adherents and spokespeople. I'm genuinely curious: what is it about socialism that seems to appeal to this vast swath of women (our hyper-intelligent, stunning and witty FReeper women excluded, of course)? 'Tis a puzzlement to me (channeling Yul Brynner). Does freedom of the individual in American society mean nothing to them? Is it a matter of, "Now that I've got mine, I'm going to get rid of some of yours"?
Thank you in advance for enlightening me.
16
posted on
06/25/2005 10:57:57 AM PDT
by
JennysCool
(In a perfect world, where everything is equal, I own the film rights and am working on the sequel)
To: marty60
Yeah, they don't like people who won't follow them mindlessly.
I am also a middle aged, above average income, white, male, Catholic, Patriotic, Conservate Right Wing Republican who doesn't hate smokers ...
Therefore, to them I am the enemy.
17
posted on
06/25/2005 11:01:22 AM PDT
by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
To: JennysCool
They just like the idea of government as Big Daddy, always taking care of them.
18
posted on
06/25/2005 11:02:15 AM PDT
by
Max in Utah
(By their works you shall know them.)
To: SmithL; SheLion; Just another Joe; CSM; Conspiracy Guy; Mears; metesky; Madame Dufarge; qam1; ...
"That's an outrage,'' Alioto-Pier said, adding that she had written Yomi Agunbiade, the department's acting general manager, a letter about the issue. "They're supposed to be implementing this next week. It's wholly irresponsible. " No madame supervisor - what is an outrage and totally irresponsible is the fact you introduced this idiocy in the first place .............
19
posted on
06/25/2005 11:07:17 AM PDT
by
Gabz
(My give-a-damn is busted.)
To: softwarecreator
20
posted on
06/25/2005 11:07:28 AM PDT
by
marty60
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson