Skip to comments.
The Supremes: Trashing the Constitution - (Founders would be disheartened, if they knew!)
OPINION EDITORIALS.COM ^
| JUNE 24, 2005
| GEORGE C. LANDRITH
Posted on 06/24/2005 2:54:11 PM PDT by CHARLITE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-199 next last
"This is what happens when liberals rule on your constitutional rights. To them, the document has no inherent meaning - it means whatever they want it to mean. When they say, "It is a living, breathing document," that is code for, "It is a meaningless document and five of us can change it whenever and however we want."
1
posted on
06/24/2005 2:54:12 PM PDT
by
CHARLITE
To: CHARLITE
Who(names please) voted for this?
2
posted on
06/24/2005 2:56:30 PM PDT
by
spyone
To: Eastbound; Marauder; tuffydoodle; BethforAmerica; Seaplaner; knews_hound; snarks_when_bored; ...
3
posted on
06/24/2005 2:56:46 PM PDT
by
CHARLITE
(I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
To: CHARLITE
How many threads is this on this non-happening?
4
posted on
06/24/2005 2:57:02 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
To: CHARLITE
5
posted on
06/24/2005 3:05:22 PM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/scotuspropertythieving.htm)
To: CHARLITE
The various lobbies for "municipalities" are quite powerful. Most city government interests want centralized, socialist government.
6
posted on
06/24/2005 3:12:39 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
To: RightWhale
the reason it is not a "non-happening" is all the 'little guys' were hoping this would be the case to overturn decades of property rights infringement by local governments. instead it has nailed the coffin shut on property rights.
7
posted on
06/24/2005 3:13:47 PM PDT
by
kpp_kpp
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: Euroam
I called my republican senators from Missouri (Kit Bond, Jim Talent). Their staffers said the the senators had no opinion on the matter. When I asked why, they said the senators were involved in other business. (Bond - some Highway Bill). I guess I'll be involved in other business when they come looking for my vote.
9
posted on
06/24/2005 3:18:11 PM PDT
by
Mulch
(tm)
To: CHARLITE; RightWhale
10
posted on
06/24/2005 3:18:54 PM PDT
by
Ladysmith
((NRA) Wisconsin Hunter Shootings: If you want on/off the WI Hunters ping list, please let me know.)
To: CHARLITE
11
posted on
06/24/2005 3:20:47 PM PDT
by
Dante3
To: Mulch
12
posted on
06/24/2005 3:21:45 PM PDT
by
Ladysmith
((NRA) Wisconsin Hunter Shootings: If you want on/off the WI Hunters ping list, please let me know.)
To: CHARLITE
All the more reason to abolish judicial review. In passing the Framers never intended to give the courts the power to pronounce on the validity of the laws. The Supreme Court did that in
Marbury and created an entirely new, unchecked power out of whole cloth. No less a figure than President Thomas Jefferson feared the consequences of an imperial judicial magistracy. Which is more or less what we now have in this country. The only way to restore the separation of powers is to take away the power from judges to write their own laws, make policy, and order the elected branches of government around. Otherwise we will end up living in a country the Framers of our Constitution would not recognize if they were alive today. Absolute power corrupts and corrupts absolutely as much in the hands of a judge as in the hands of a politician. That is why is time to get rid of judicial review.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
13
posted on
06/24/2005 3:25:25 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: spyone
The only four who dissented were Scalia, Thomas, Rehnquist and O'Connor. The other five "made it happen."
Char (:
14
posted on
06/24/2005 3:26:34 PM PDT
by
CHARLITE
(I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
To: CHARLITE; All

I, for one, for over a year here on FR, have been saying,
It's all about the judges!
After hundreds of emails, phone calls and faxes and bunches of uncontributed dollars to the Republican cause on my part, comes this latest travesty of justice.
I'm sorry, but it just totally dumbfounds me that people continue to let five idiots in black robes trash our country.
To me, freedom of speech, freedom of religion and property rights are what make America stand head and shoulders above the rest of the world. We've now lost 1/3 of this and the other 2/3 are under continuous vicious attack from the judiciary.
What's it gonna take for people to wake up on this?
I've been stumbling around in the dictionary and thesaurus trying to find a word to sum up this horrible feeling in my stomach. I think heartsick comes the closest.
15
posted on
06/24/2005 3:49:32 PM PDT
by
upchuck
(If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: kpp_kpp
Yeah, there was hope. Insteads they got a 'hands off' by Fed Gov. We are back on our own resources as usual. New London is a blighted area. Groton is sweet, too bad about the Sub Base being closed. Their shopping mall won't make a bit of difference, but that's the way they want it. Democracy in action.
16
posted on
06/24/2005 4:03:39 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
To: upchuck
To me, freedom of speech, freedom of religion and property rights are what make America stand head and shoulders above the rest of the world. We've now lost 1/3 of this and the other 2/3 are under continuous vicious attack from the judiciary. You must have missed SCOTUS's CFR ruling which confirmed that criticizing a Senator on teevee within 60 days of an election is a Speech Crime not protected by the 1st Amendment.
17
posted on
06/24/2005 4:03:40 PM PDT
by
AdamSelene235
(Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)
To: Ladysmith
That's right, I don't see this as epochal one way or the other. If they trashed the 1967 Treaty and established property rights in outer space then I would say that they had done something worthy.
18
posted on
06/24/2005 4:06:01 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
To: RightWhale
It's not democracy in action you halfwit.
It's treason and it's socialism, but it's not democracy.
To: Mulch
I called Senator Dole and Burr from NC, both staffers who answered said they had received a lot of calls on it and could tell people cared about the issue. They said they would update me with what the senators will do. I just told them my opinion, didn't ask what they were going to do about it.
I'll be watching them.
20
posted on
06/24/2005 4:06:55 PM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/scotuspropertythieving.htm)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-199 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson