Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gumlegs
Astrology is unchanged after a couple of thousand years.

Evolutionist speculations have been around just as long. The assumptions remain the same. The evidence is consistently shoehorned to fit the assumptions. Astrologers are no different.

75 posted on 06/24/2005 1:00:53 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
Here's another difference: You don't understand evolutionary theory and can't be bothered learning anything about it (other than the usual distortions and strawman versions of it we see from Discovery Institute fans). I don't know what you know about astrology, but it really doesn't matter because you haven't grasped the basics of science.

I've studied evolutionary theory. I can't say I understand it fully, or that I'm up on all the cutting-edge aspects of it, but I have a good, basic grasp of it. And I know a lot about astrology. I've studied it in detail. Evolutionary theory is science and astrology isn't.

N-Rays?

78 posted on 06/24/2005 1:07:20 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson