Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gumlegs
He thinks astrology is a science.

Absolutely, and it has an exactitude comparable to that of evolution's inferences, extrapolations, and hopeful constructs based upon unobservable history, coupled with the presupposition that nothing intelligent could possibly be involved with the formation of intelligent beings.

50 posted on 06/24/2005 10:08:03 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
You have no idea of what you're posting about.

You don't understand evolution, you don't understand astrology, and you don't understand science. (That you would mistake astrology for science is telling).

Your ability to construct a simple declarative sentence is shaky at best.

But otherwise, you're doing okay.

53 posted on 06/24/2005 10:13:37 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Fester Chugabrew
coupled with the presupposition that nothing intelligent could possibly be involved with the formation of intelligent beings.

Who says that? Plenty of biologists and other scientists believe that God does things, including evolution. Why do you reject their belief in God?

60 posted on 06/24/2005 11:19:15 AM PDT by narby (There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson