How convenient of you to formulate your own definition and understanding of science. How inconvenient that so many observers have arrived at the conclusion, based upon solid evidence, that intelligent design was involved not only with the creation of the universe, but is also responsible for sustaining it to this very moment. Since their evidence and observations are not in alignment with your own presuppositions they are suddenly deemed "not scientific, and "not capable of understanding science."
That tune's been whistling in the dark for 150 years. Reckon it will continue.
What evidence, let alone "solid evidence", exists that 'intelligent design' is, right at this moment, sustaining the universe in existence?