Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High court's property decision stirs anger
World Net Daily.com ^ | June 24, 2005

Posted on 06/24/2005 2:23:15 AM PDT by ovrtaxt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-150 next last
To: Caipirabob

I say we form a property rights militia and go protect these people's homes!!! Sign me up!


81 posted on 06/24/2005 6:14:21 AM PDT by Tatze (I voted for John Kerry before I voted against him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

We don't have the man power to stem the invasion of illegals on the border, but just wait till an 80 year old couple doesn't want to leave their ancestral home because the local politicians want to buy more votes. We'll see 24 hr. coverage of dozens of SWAT teams in their ninja outfits swarming over the scene with weapons drawn until the pitiful octogenarians are trundled away to the court. Thomas Jefferson and George Washington are weeping in their graves.


82 posted on 06/24/2005 6:16:55 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell

We should point out that this guy "from" Texas was born in Conneticut to an elite family, raised in elite boarding schools in New England, and is about as much a Texan as I am. Also that he is obviously a corporate puppethead designed to make the religious types feel warm and fuzzy.


83 posted on 06/24/2005 6:24:20 AM PDT by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tkathy

Having the Witch Queen in the White House will make no difference. The same people will be in charge. The only difference, instead of listening to W's scripted crap, we have to look at...urp...It...


84 posted on 06/24/2005 6:27:09 AM PDT by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Tom D.

I'm not a Christian, but the bible shows, again and again, that some things don't change.


85 posted on 06/24/2005 6:29:03 AM PDT by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: djf

I think that was Jefferson.


86 posted on 06/24/2005 6:32:10 AM PDT by eyespysomething ( A penny saved is a government oversight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
"Robert Bork, in books such as The Tempting of America, argues that the Constitution should be interpreted based on the Framers' original understanding of the constitutional text. He is an advocate for judicial restraint, reiterating that it was the Court's task to adjudicate, not to legislate, from the bench. Robert Bork has written: "We are increasingly governed not by law or elected representatives but by an unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable committee of lawyers applying no will but their own." Bork's views have influenced the legal opinions of conservative judges such as Antonin Scalia and Chief Justice William Rehnquist".... Robert Bork
87 posted on 06/24/2005 6:36:20 AM PDT by Aquamarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: DB
Ronald Reagan put Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court. Had he picked someone more conservative we wouldn't be having this conversation.

Has he picked someone more conservative at the time the Democrat Senators would not have approved it. There was no need for a filibuster since the Dems controlled the Senate back then. All three of the Republican appointed judges that voted for this were approved by a Democrat Senate.

88 posted on 06/24/2005 6:39:15 AM PDT by m1-lightning (God, Guns, and Country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
Taken from the link provided above.

"Bork was a circuit judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 1982 to 1988, and was nominated by President Ronald Reagan to the Supreme Court in 1987. He was strongly opposed by political groups favoring a continuation of the liberal jurisprudence of the Warren court.

89 posted on 06/24/2005 6:42:31 AM PDT by Aquamarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: machman; Happy2BMe; MeekOneGOP; PhilDragoo; potlatch; ntnychik; Smartass; Alamo-Girl; Mia T; ...


 COMMON   GOOD 

90 posted on 06/24/2005 6:58:27 AM PDT by devolve (-------------------------------------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

I read this article, and I can't believe it. What if this had happened in the 1940's instead of today.

Republicans, supposedly the party of big business, would have been the ones cheering about something like this, right? Supposedly, the D's were the ones thinking about the little people - poor property owners being forced out of their homes by Vanderbilt, Carnegie, and Rockefeller. There would have been insinuations of influence on the Supreme Court - millionaires buying the right to wreck homes to build factories.

Today? It's the liberals fault.

After all the backstabbing by supposed conservatives in the last two weeks, I've come to a conclusion:

There is no such thing as liberal or conservative in this country anymore.

The battle today is different. There are those that believes that the US should lead the world, and there are those that simply don't want the US to lead the world. I think it may be as simple as that.

The two pillars of our strength here in the US has been the right to own property, and the ability to enforce contracts. The rest of the structure was a limited central government, with a Constitution that specified that states retained all powers save only a limited few.

It worked precisely because central government had been a failure since Rome.

From now on, I think I'm going to stop refering to people in terms of consevative and liberal. Now there are only federalists and strict constructionists. Federalists are split into two factions - Socialists and globalists.

Socialist are what they've always been - compassionate about people through the application of somebody elses money. Globalists are socialists with a foreign policy outlook that sees the US's role as leader and proselytizer for liberty as outmoded and even arrogant.

After applying that filter to the Senate, the House, the Press, and the President, EVERYTHING starts making sense again. It is especially apparent in the Senate. Oddly, the house has become a calmer voice of reason than the Senate, even after passing a flag-burning bill.

The Supremes are about 6-3 federalist. The senate is about 56-44 federalist and getting worse by the day. The House is slightly more constructionist than federalist. The Press? Overwhelmingly globalist.

Levin's book has blown the whistle on all of this, and it seems like the Supreme Court has been in overdrive to gut what remains of the Constitution before people start dying off. Problem here is that most of the problem with the current court is still pretty healthy.

As for Red and Blue states, it appears that some decisions have been made on the coasts that the rest of the country hasn't heard about. The Blue States have the gold and want to make the rules. The Red States understand this and realize that if the Blue States had their way there simply wouldn't be states to worry about in the first place.

This is why federalists want the electoral college dismantled immediately. It's the only thing that gives a state like Wyoming any kind of influence in DC.


91 posted on 06/24/2005 6:59:30 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs (The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodBlessRonaldReagan

That comment of yours doesn't make much sense!


92 posted on 06/24/2005 7:03:18 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (Getting old sucks, but it is the only viable option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

I am frustrated after year of voting for the supposed party of limited governemtn, that something like this could happen. I realize the SCOTUS 5 were not all Republican appointees, but enough were to set my teeth on edge.


93 posted on 06/24/2005 7:27:57 AM PDT by GodBlessRonaldReagan (Count Petofi will not be denied!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: hershey

It can be overturned faster than that.

Yesterday I read a comment somewhere here that many states have stricter rules. Check yours. And do it now while there's attention being paid to the issue.


94 posted on 06/24/2005 7:33:15 AM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: From many - one.

I live in MA. I may be doomed.


95 posted on 06/24/2005 7:39:47 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

You seem to be very confused. I think your confusion is due to a misunderstanding of the meaning of Federalism.

Visit this site: http://www.federalist.com

Their newsletter is the best on the web, every FReeper and conservative should read it.


96 posted on 06/24/2005 7:40:37 AM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

We are now officially living in a kleptocracy


97 posted on 06/24/2005 7:41:24 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates - Jancie Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Wonder if NYC could say it is for the community good to make the site where the UN is, into a parking lot.


98 posted on 06/24/2005 7:42:37 AM PDT by mware ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche........ "Nope, you are"-- GOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Toll
At some point other "Americans" are going to have to move to evict these people from their homes. I would love to meet them on the field that day.
Time to form a perimeter and dig in.
THE NEW LONDON PERIMETER PARTY.
99 posted on 06/24/2005 7:45:31 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: hershey

I'd be really curious. Can you find out?


I have an idea.

We e-mail our relevant state legislators and ask, also asking permission to quote the responses. Then post them here.


100 posted on 06/24/2005 7:46:12 AM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson