To: Cincinatus' Wife
This is the answer to the SCOTUS decision. The Majority even suggested this in their decision.
I'm glad some States Legislatures are reacting this way to this horrible decision handed down by the SCOTUS
5 posted on
06/24/2005 12:00:18 AM PDT by
MJY1288
("Dingy" Harry Reid & "Disturbed" Durbin are a Waste of Tax Payers Money)
To: MJY1288
It will be interersting to see how states guard their citizens and protect them against this ruling that is so tempting to government powers that be.
It all boils down to how loud the people scream.
To: MJY1288; Cincinatus' Wife; MeekOneGOP; rmlew; Diddle E. Squat; deport; maui_hawaii; Ben Ficklin; ...
This is the answer to the SCOTUS decision. The Majority even suggested this in their decision. I'm glad some States Legislatures are reacting this way to this horrible decision handed down by the SCOTUS
Even enhanced state protections of private property won't protect a against eminent domain takings by the federal government or the UN!
20 posted on
06/24/2005 12:08:33 AM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: MJY1288
Horrible decision? Thats putting it MILDLY. Is this Scotus lib? So what country are we in where property can be seized at will?
83 posted on
06/24/2005 4:59:33 AM PDT by
stopem
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson