To: MJY1288; Cincinatus' Wife; MeekOneGOP; rmlew; Diddle E. Squat; deport; maui_hawaii; Ben Ficklin; ...
This is the answer to the SCOTUS decision. The Majority even suggested this in their decision. I'm glad some States Legislatures are reacting this way to this horrible decision handed down by the SCOTUS
Even enhanced state protections of private property won't protect a against eminent domain takings by the federal government or the UN!
20 posted on
06/24/2005 12:08:33 AM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: Paleo Conservative
How did the UN get included in this debate?
I despise the UN, but I must have missed their roll in this Emenant Domain issue???
28 posted on
06/24/2005 12:11:20 AM PDT by
MJY1288
("Dingy" Harry Reid & "Disturbed" Durbin are a Waste of Tax Payers Money)
To: Paleo Conservative
The vultures are already circling.
***....officials in the beachfront town of Freeport, south of Houston, said they would move aggressively to condemn property owned by two seafood companies to clear the way for an $8 million private marina. ....***
To: Paleo Conservative
Look at the bright side ... New York can now move to do something about that blight at Turtle Bay.
54 posted on
06/24/2005 12:42:09 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(Same stuff, different democRAT [this tagline rated PG-13])
To: Paleo Conservative
some state politicians are planning immediate legislation to counter the communist supremes.
85 posted on
06/24/2005 5:49:12 AM PDT by
ken21
To: Paleo Conservative
What...... and eliminate future projects such as the following? No way
The Ballpark in Arlington
Home of the Texas Rangers90 posted on
06/24/2005 1:33:00 PM PDT by
deport
(Save a horse...... ride a cowgirl)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson