Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"The justices said they were unwilling to "second guess" local officials on what is best for their communities."

But they have no problem second guessing the knowledge of the employers of the local government drones, namely the homeowners. Typical. Well, there goes whatever was left of the "American Dream". I'm so ashamed of SCOTUS I'm literally sick to my stomach.

1 posted on 06/23/2005 3:26:27 PM PDT by Still Thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: Still Thinking

If your property taxes aren't high enough, some developer could make a case to the mayor that he could put a strip mall through your bedroom for more tax revenue and he would win. What a revoltin toin of events.


2 posted on 06/23/2005 3:29:43 PM PDT by Thebaddog (Dawgs off the coffee table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

Write your elected Representatives: Following is what I wrote mine:

Again five black robed tyrants have violated the Constitution of the United States by making an amendment to the document and dictating law that they have no power to do.

The taking of property for private use is not in the Constitution and the Supreme Court has not authority to dictate a law that allows this unlawful practice to take place.

The Congress has the power to impeach judges and the power to limit what the court can do.

When will you take back our freedom from these black robed anti-American dictators?

Or is it time to say that the Republic has been taken over by black robed tyrants. If so, then Congress should close as there is not longer any need for you to play act as if you were doing something.


3 posted on 06/23/2005 3:34:12 PM PDT by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking
We need men like these.....


New Hampshire: Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts: John Hancock, Samual Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island: Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut: Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York: William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey: Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania: Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware: Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland: Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia: George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina: William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina: Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia: Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton
4 posted on 06/23/2005 3:34:29 PM PDT by OSHA (I,ll be breaf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

this is one of the worst rulings ever


5 posted on 06/23/2005 3:34:39 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking
The five 'justices' who decided that the government can take your home away from you whenever it decides it wants to:

For the record.

6 posted on 06/23/2005 3:35:08 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking
Eminent domain now means condemning private property to enhance tax revenues. Liberals love this!

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
7 posted on 06/23/2005 3:35:36 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking
Shouldn't this be handled by the States?

Why is this a Federal issue?

8 posted on 06/23/2005 3:36:54 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

Hope that some developer wants to put a bunch of condos on the property of the homes that the five justices live in. Since the city or county will determine the value it will be well under market value. Take their homes and make condos or strip malls I am sure that they are not paying the amount of taxes that would be collected if there were a retail space on the property.


9 posted on 06/23/2005 3:37:13 PM PDT by YOUGOTIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking
This decision has made me sick to my stomach also. Why would anybody want to be a home owner if your local government could now bull doze it for any cockamamie excuse!
10 posted on 06/23/2005 3:37:16 PM PDT by tob2 (Old Fossil and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking
And three of the five in the majority (Stevens, Souter and Kennedy) are Republican appointees. Hell of a lot of good THEY did us.

When/if Bush gets to a chance to appoint a justice to the Supreme Court, he better be willing to stand up to the firestorm and pick a Constitutional conservative.

I'm disgusted beyond words.

11 posted on 06/23/2005 3:39:35 PM PDT by Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

I reversed my flag to fly upside down when I read the ruling. My ship of state is in distress. If all the property owners out there did the same, i would be a demonstration that would NOT go unnoticed.


12 posted on 06/23/2005 3:44:36 PM PDT by Roccus (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

The FR poll on this doesn't have a strong enough selection for this evil, comtemptable, vile, disgusting, situation!

"...is it time yet...?"

Top sends!


13 posted on 06/23/2005 3:47:18 PM PDT by petro45acp (SUPPORT/BE YOUR LOCAL SHEEPDOG!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

oh goodie a Freakin Wal-mart on every corner now.


21 posted on 06/23/2005 4:02:57 PM PDT by bikerman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

This doesn't stop at land. It applies to all property. Guns, money and butter and beyond.


23 posted on 06/23/2005 4:07:16 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nothingnew

ping


24 posted on 06/23/2005 4:10:23 PM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

If this were to happen to me, there'd be quite a few politicians and judges homes burned to the ground.

F'ing tyrants.


26 posted on 06/23/2005 4:14:22 PM PDT by Monitor (Gun control isn't about guns; it's about control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking
I have updated my FMCDH (From My Cold Dead Hands) sign-off with the addition of (BITS).....Blood In The Streets, which I foresee coming soon, due to the enormous increase of the Marxist progressive movement being shoved down the throat of this failing REPUBLIC through the Judicial tyranny of fiat law, the passing of unconstitutional laws by the Legislative and Executive branches of our government and the enormous tax burden placed upon the average American to support unconstitutional programs put forth by Marxist ideology.

I do not advocate revolution. I only think of what I foresee.

FMCDH(BITS)

28 posted on 06/23/2005 4:19:12 PM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: farmfriend
(gas)ping

FMCDH(BITS)

30 posted on 06/23/2005 4:25:18 PM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking
Never thought we'd need an amendment to reinstate the 5th amendment. "... nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
31 posted on 06/23/2005 4:25:31 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

I think this will depress property values. I for one would never consider purchasing property anywhere that would be considered "convenient " to town.


33 posted on 06/23/2005 4:35:09 PM PDT by Boiling point (If God had not meant for man to eat animals, he wouldn't have made them out of meat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson