[maine-iac7]

The USSC ruling doesn't demand that states play fast and loose with property rights.....it just says they can.

And the difference will be?

The farmer opened the barn door but didn't demand the cows go out - think they'll stay in the barn or head for those green - and free - neighbors pastures, now that the fences have been torn down?

[Arkinsaw]

And the difference will be?

The farmer opened the barn door but didn't demand the cows go out - think they'll stay in the barn or head for those green - and free - neighbors pastures, now that the fences have been torn down?

Ummm, I was replying to someone who said that a California Constitutional amendment that was stricter than this USSC ruling would not stand up in court. My point was that it will stand because the ruling does not demand that states seize homes this way, it merely says they can. That point is correct.