Posted on 06/23/2005 1:45:19 PM PDT by seamus
"Its outrageous that the same Democrats who stood by Dick Durbins libeling of our military are now expressing faux outrage over Karl Roves statement of historical fact. George Soros, Michael Moore, MoveOn and the hard left were wrong after 9/11, just as it was wrong for Democrat leaders to stand by and remain silent after Dick Durbin made his deplorable comments.
- RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman
Liberal Third Party Groups Urged Restraint, Blamed America:
Immediately After 9/11, MoveOn.Org Petition Urged Moderation And Restraint And Use Of International Judicial Institutions.
We, The Undersigned, Citizens And Residents Of The United States Of America Appeal To The President Of The United States, George W. Bush And To All Leaders Internationally To Use Moderation And Restraint In Responding To The Recent Terrorist Attacks Against The United States. (MoveOn.Org Website, MoveOn Peace, http://web.archive.org/web/20021127190638/peace.moveon.org/petition.php3, Posted 9/13/01, Accessed 6/23/05)
We Implore The Powers That Be To Use, Wherever Possible, International Judicial Institutions And International Human Rights Law To Bring To Justice Those Responsible For The Attacks, Rather Than The Instruments Of War, Violence Or Destruction. (MoveOn.Org Website, MoveOn Peace, http://web.archive.org/web/20021127190638/peace.moveon.org/petition.php3, Posted 9/13/01, Accessed 6/23/05)
[W]e Demand That There Be No Recourse To Nuclear, Chemical Or Biological Weapons, Or Any Weapons Of Indiscriminate Destruction, And Feel That It Is Our Inalienable Human Right To Live In A World Free Of Such Arms. (MoveOn.Org Website, MoveOn Peace, http://web.archive.org/web/20021127190638/peace.moveon.org/petition.php3, Posted 9/13/01, Accessed 6/23/05)
Just After 9/11, Liberal Filmmaker Michael Moore Derided Terror And Bloodshed Committed By Americans. (David Brooks, Op-Ed, All Hail Moore, The New York Times, 6/26/04)
Just After 9/11, Moore Blamed Americas Taxpayer-Funded Terrorism And Bush Administration For Terrorist Attacks. We abhor terrorism unless were the ones doing the terrorizing. We paid and trained and armed a group of terrorists in Nicaragua in the 1980s who killed over 30,000 civilians. That was OUR work. You and me. Lets mourn, lets grieve, and when its appropriate lets examine our contribution to the unsafe world we live in. (Michael Moore Website Archive, Death, Downtown, Posted 9/12/01, www.michaelmoore.com, Accessed 7/27/04)
Michael Moore Said U.S. Should Not Have Removed Taliban After 9/11. Moore: Likewise, to bomb Afghanistan I mean, Ive never understood this, Tim. (CNBCs Tim Russert, 10/19/02)
Liberal Donor George Soros Claimed America Should Have Treated 9/11 Attacks As Crime, Responded With Police Work. War is a false and misleading metaphor in the context of combating terrorism. Treating the attacks of September 11 as crimes against humanity would have been more appropriate. Crimes require police work, not military action. To protect against terrorism, you need precautionary measures, awareness, and intelligence gathering all of which ultimately depend on the support of the populations among which terrorists operate. Imagine for a moment that September 11 had been treated as a crime. We would have pursued Bin Laden in Afghanistan, but we would not have invaded Iraq. Nor would we have our military struggling to perform police work in full combat gear and getting killed in the process. (George Soros, The Bubble Of American Supremacy, 2004, p. 18)
Soros Said The Execution Of 9/11 Attacks Could Not Have Been More Spectacular. Admittedly, the terrorist attack was a historic event in its own right. Hijacking fully loaded airplanes and using them as suicide bombs was an audacious idea, and the execution could not have been more spectacular. (George Soros, The Bubble Of American Supremacy, 2004, p. 2)
Soros Said War On Terror Had Claimed More Innocent Victims Than 9/11 Attack Itself. This is a very tough thing to say, but the fact is, that the war on terror as conducted by this administration, has claimed more innocent victims that the original attack itself. (George Soros, Remarks At Take Back America Conference, Washington, DC, 6/3/04)
Liberal Democrats Urged Restraint, Blamed America:
Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH): The Time For Peace Is Now, [Kucinich] Declared Optimistically July 11, Two Months To The Day Before Terrorists Hit The Pentagon And The World Trade Center. Sitting In His Capitol Hill Office Last Week, Near A Window Where He Could See The Smoke Rising From The Pentagon On Sept. 11, Kucinich Insisted He Is More Optimistic Than Ever That People Worldwide Are Ready To Embrace The Cause Of Nonviolence. (Elizabeth Auster, Offer The Hand Of Peace, [Cleveland, OH] Plain Dealer, 9/30/01)
Kucinich: Afghanistan May Be An Incubator Of Terrorism But It Doesnt Follow That We Bomb Afghanistan (Elizabeth Auster, Offer The Hand Of Peace, [Cleveland, OH] Plain Dealer, 9/30/01)
Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI): Only Now Are We Trying To Figure Out What Is Islam. Maybe If There Was A Department Of Peace, They Would Be Able To Say, Uh-Oh, Weve Got Some Problems With These People, I Truly Believe That If We Had A Department Of Peace, We Would Have Seen [9/11] Coming. (Ethan Wallison, War A Challenge For Peace Caucus, Roll Call, 10/1/01)
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA): I Am Convinced That Military Action Will Not Prevent Further Acts Of International Terrorism Against The United States. (Eddy Ramirez, Calif. Congresswoman Alone In Vote Against War Powers Resolution, [University Of California-Berkeley] Daily Californian, 9/17/01)
Al Sharpton (D-NY) Said That The Attacks On The World Trade Center Are Evidence That America Is Beginning To Reap What It Has Sown. (Adam Nagourney, Say It Loud, The New York Times, 12/1/02)
Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) Claimed Osama Bin Laden Could Be Compared To Revolutionaries That Helped To Cast Off The British Crown. One could say that Osama bin Laden and these non-nation-state fighters with religious purpose are very similar to those kind of atypical revolutionaries that helped to cast off the British crown, Kaptur told an Ohio newspaper, The (Toledo) Blade. (Malie Rulon, Lawmaker Compares Osama, U.S. Patriots, The Associated Press, 3/6/03)
Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) Said The United States Would Pay Every Single Hour, Ever Single Day That Bombs Were Dropped In Afghanistan. How much longer does the bombing campaign continue? Biden asked during an Oct. 22 speech at the Council on Foreign Relations. Were going to pay every single hour, every single day it continues. (Miles A. Pomper, "Building Anti-Terrorism Coalition Vaults Ahead Of Other Priorities," Congressional Quarterly Weekly, 10/26/01)
The Bombing Campaign, [Biden] Said, Reinforced Existing Stereotypes Of The United States As A High-Tech Bully (Miles A. Pomper, "Building Anti-Terrorism Coalition Vaults Ahead Of Other Priorities," Congressional Quarterly Weekly, 10/26/01)
Gov. Howard Dean (D-VT) Said Osama Bin Laden Not Guilty. Dean: I Still Have This Old-Fashioned Notion That Even With People Like Osama, Who Is Very Likely To Be Found Guilty, We Should Do Our Best Not To, In Positions Of Executive Power, Not To Prejudge Jury Trials. (Dean Not Ready To Pronounce Osama Bin Laden Guilty, The Associated Press, 12/26/03)
Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) To High School Students: How Would [Muslims] Look At Us Today If We Had Been There Helping Them With Some Of That Rather Than Just Being The People Who Are Going To Bomb In Iraq And Go To Afghanistan? War Is Expensive Too Your Generation Ought To Be Thinking About Whether We Should Be Better Neighbors Out In Other Countries So That They Have A Different Vision Of Us. (Gregg Herrington, Senator Asks Students To Ponder, The [Vancouver, WA] Columbian, 12/19/02)
Sen. John Kerry (D-MA): [W]ar On Terror Is Far Less Of A Military Operation And Far More Of An Intelligence-Gathering, Law-Enforcement Operation. (The Iowa Brown & Black Coalition Presidential Forum, Des Moines, IA, 1/11/04)
Kerry: [W]hat Weve Learned Is That The War On Terror Is Much More Of An Intelligence Operation And A Law Enforcement Operation. (NPRs All Things Considered, 3/19/03)
###
Paid for by the Republican National Committee 310 First Street SE, Washington, DC 20003 - (202) 863-8614 - www.gop.com
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate committee.
Love it. Another perfect Rovian storm.
Excellent post! EXCELLENT!
So.... what's the RNC doing in response??
I for one wish that there were more black Republicans.
The Dems have, though, succeeded in turning the spotlight away from Durbin and shining it on Rove, who's not a very likable figure thanks to previous MSM demonizing.
Has McPain lost what's left of his mind? How do they censure Rove? He's not a senator. He's not an elected ANYthing. Am I assuming wrong?
Another point.
Isn't this just part of the normal political discourse?
Didn't Hillary say that Republicans wanted to destroy the country?
How is that OK, but Rove saying democrats wanted a more gentle war on terror out-of-bounds?
His comments weren't even that harsh.
That statement by Moore is, in fact, a load of crap. But it is not what Rove was referring to - Rove said therapy for the terrorists.
There's real ideas on the DU site? Where?
They have succeeded in no such thing.
What they have done is focus attention on Rove's comments. That opens up room to go on offensive and put ALL the Democrats comments under a microscope. What Rove did was not only keep Durbin in the spotlight, but bring the whole Democratic Party under that spotlight.
Maybe there is a quote somewhere about it. But the speech as a POLITICAL speech to a group of CONSERVATIVES. Those speeches always have hyperbole (like Hillary saying that conservatives were going to destroy the country, that the far-right wants to make a theocracy, etc.).
The therapy line is an apt metaphor for how many liberals describe the terrorists. I've had more than one conversation suggest that terrorists are just misguided, having legitimate grievances with us but simply lacking the ability to find the appropriate outlet.
That is easily described as wanting to put them in "therapy" rather than bury them 6 feet under.
Texascajun is pretending. McCain did not really issue such a statement. And no, Rove could not be "censured". (Note that the claim included that the other six Repubs who negotiated the judges compromise would also vote with McCain to "censure" Rove. The stuff of fantasy, but it just proves how little we trust McCain!)
Great job by Melman. Use their own words uttered and documented after 9/11 to bash them.
" "Its outrageous that the same Democrats who stood by Dick Durbins libeling of our military are now expressing faux outrage over Karl Roves statement of historical fact. George Soros, Michael Moore, MoveOn and the hard left were wrong after 9/11, just as it was wrong for Democrat leaders to stand by and remain silent after Dick Durbin made his deplorable comments.
- RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman
This was ALMOST too easy. Rove never said Democrats, he said liberals. He knew the Democrats would take the bait and then Ken Mehlman set the hook.
Now the Democrats cannot shake the well-set hook.
Game-set-match. Rove/Mehlman
Careful there, Rove never said DEMOCRATS wanted this, he merely said LIBERALS wanted it. Then all you-know-what broke loose from the Senate Democrats, as if every single solitary one of them was admitting to being a Liberal. Sheer genius by Rove.
Is this true? Is McCain really that crazy?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.