I would like they would have ruled out semen, but maybe not. You know how they tell only a partial truth sometimes, but they did seem to rule out it being DNA evidence. Now that I'm thinking about it, they did NOT tell us what it actually was, did they???? Did they only say it was NOT blood??
Hmmmmmmmmmm.... Also it takes sometimes weeks to do DNA testing. Dang I'm not sure on this one. So much to try and remember with this case.
That's correct, all they said was that it might be saliva or "something."
I think it was reported at the time that it was transmission fluid