I thought they tested the "bloodstain" in the backseat...surely they ruled out semen when they ruled out blood?
I would like they would have ruled out semen, but maybe not. You know how they tell only a partial truth sometimes, but they did seem to rule out it being DNA evidence. Now that I'm thinking about it, they did NOT tell us what it actually was, did they???? Did they only say it was NOT blood??
Hmmmmmmmmmm.... Also it takes sometimes weeks to do DNA testing. Dang I'm not sure on this one. So much to try and remember with this case.