Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stew Padasso

Even the DUers don't like this. When Freepers and DUers can agree on something, you KNOW there's a problem.


43 posted on 06/23/2005 8:19:41 AM PDT by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Quick1

You know it.


44 posted on 06/23/2005 8:20:04 AM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Quick1
The DUmmies heads are exploding. They can't understand why the idiots (Souter, Breyer, Ginsburg and Stevens) are in favor of expanding gov't power.
Hey DUmmies, these are the people you are in favor of. These are the people YOU want on the court.
166 posted on 06/23/2005 9:00:17 AM PDT by sharkhawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Quick1; ninenot; sittnick
This ultraelitist decision may be the straw that breaks SCOTUS camel's back. There is nothing liberal or conservative about not wanting to be forced from your property at all. Normal human lethargy militates against being disrupted as to your residence even in marginal neighborhoods, much less nice neighborhoods on rural lakes or coastal beaches.

How much less should we suffer such abuse when the purpose is not for an interstate highway or for some arguably necessary government purpose but for private development schemes which "benefit" the public interest (if any) at all only to the extent that the gummint critters will have more tax money to squander on their re-election schemes while (in many cases) being paid off by the bribes of feeding developers.

Lest I mislead, I have no problem with development but is must be achieved, if at all, the old-fashioned and more expensive way of paying as necessary in a free, arm's length transaction, with current owners. If your development project has greatly enhanced the value of their property, too bad.

There are an awful lot of trendy leftists (Phil Donahue, Marlo Thomas, Paul Newman, et al.) who own coastal and other verrrry desireable property in Connecticut and NEVER join with conservatives otherwise who are going to be VERRRRRY angry at this decision and the fact that it was delivered by the Stevens, Ginsberg, Souter, Breyer group who are their normal heroes and Anthony Kennedy who made the difference for them on abortion.

Look for a wave of state legislation to restrain this result since Stevens ruled that locals know better than the feds. State governments are local by comparison with Feds.

Can we spell "wedge issue."

182 posted on 06/23/2005 9:06:13 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Quick1
Even the DUers don't like this. When Freepers and DUers can agree on something, you KNOW there's a problem

You're absolutely right.

415 posted on 06/23/2005 11:56:15 AM PDT by proud American in Canada (Please check out my new & improved profile page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson