Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Politicalmom
They applied a new law allowing dehydration to a woman who could NOT have expressed a wish for it, since it WAS NOT LEGAL

Incorrect. Florida did not and does not require a written living will. See In re Guardianship of Browning, Florida State Supreme Court, 1990.

228 posted on 06/23/2005 8:29:37 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: malakhi
Incorrect. Florida did not and does not require a written living will. See In re Guardianship of Browning, Florida State Supreme Court, 1990.

Thank your for dispelling a misconception I had. I was under the impression that the Legislature determined what the law was, and the courts just applied it to specific cases...but that must not be right, or that would make your citing a court ruling rather irrelevant. I'm just a dumb old conservative, not able to see legal Penubras and all.

233 posted on 06/23/2005 8:33:30 PM PDT by AndyTheBear (Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

To: malakhi

That has nothing to do with what I said.

Terri could NOT HAVE WANTED to be dehydrated, since that was not legal before she was injured. She "could" have said she didn't want a ventilator or whatever, but not that she wanted to be dehydrated. They applied a NEW law RETROACTIVELY to Terri. That is clearly wrong.


241 posted on 06/23/2005 8:47:25 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Just one more reason to hate the government....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson