All the facts in the case and MS's actions demonstrate that Schiavo had absolutely no right to end his wife's life. She was in no way at the end of her life...she was a living breathing human being. She was not suffering from a fatal illness - and cancer was not ravaging her body. She was ravaged by the withholding of food and drink in her last days.
Abominable and barbaric!
Yes, she was. That fact cannot be denied. But the autopsy proved that she was never gonna "come out of it" and live a normal life again.
I agree with you, barring a signed and notorized written statment backing Michael's claims, she should not have been killed.
Again, you DON'T KNOW what Terri wanted any more than I do.
I go back to this point:
I know what MY wife wants and if this were to happen to her, I would fight you people all the way. You can say I have no right to do it, but YOU have even LESS right to condemn her to a life she doesn't want anymore.
All the "I miss Terri" and crying would mean nothing to me ... you don't care about her ... you, in my opinion, would just want a martyr for your cause.
Again, I'm just generalizing and definately not singling you or anyone out. Basically, we agree on one level but disagree on another.
"All the facts in the case and MS's actions demonstrate that Schiavo had absolutely no right to end his wife's life. She was in no way at the end of her life...she was a living breathing human being. She was not suffering from a fatal illness - and cancer was not ravaging her body. She was ravaged by the withholding of food and drink in her last days. "
Oh, one little fact I forgot to mention. She didn't have a cerebral cortex; it was mush. Minor detail.