Skip to comments.
ESPN To Cut Back Baseball/Hockey (More Original Programming,Less Sports)
Variety ^
| 6-22-05
| John Dempsey
Posted on 06/22/2005 9:55:22 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Oh please.If they are going to use MTV as a model to follow by I might as well just skip ESPN forever from now on. Less sports on the total sports network. They suck now. All you see is poker for 9 hours a day and sportscenter recaps for another 9 with barely 3-4 hrs to cover a live sports event.
Give me 1982 ESPN any day of the week over the crap they push now.
To: My Favorite Headache
2
posted on
06/22/2005 9:56:08 AM PDT
by
Patrick1
To: Patrick1
3
posted on
06/22/2005 9:57:31 AM PDT
by
JohnnyP
To: My Favorite Headache
The new ESPN - 1 hour of sports news, 3 hours of sports, and 20 hours of "reality" television programming.
To: My Favorite Headache
I wish they would just close down so I don't have to pay 5 bucks a month for a station that I don't watch.
5
posted on
06/22/2005 9:58:37 AM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: JohnnyP
6
posted on
06/22/2005 9:58:49 AM PDT
by
Patrick1
To: My Favorite Headache
...the stereotypical potbellied sports nut, stretched out in his undershirt on a Barcalounger with a can of beer in one hand and a remote in the other.But we ARE their audience. You're right, they're going to MTV this thing until the "entertainment" and "sports" are nowhere to be found.
Disney sucks.
7
posted on
06/22/2005 9:59:16 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Be alert! The world needs more lerts.)
To: My Favorite Headache
I've noticed the phenomenon on TVLand as well. Original programing like top ten shows and the horrible Farrah reality show and fewer old shows which is why we watched it in the first place. Very sad.
To: My Favorite Headache
"Kagan Research says ESPN already harvests more ad revenues than any other cable network, projecting a record $869.2 million in 2005, a 9% gain over those of last year."
Doing what they're doing now.So, lets mess it up.
9
posted on
06/22/2005 10:00:00 AM PDT
by
John W
To: My Favorite Headache
Sigh. MTV model is right. They aren't going to improve their ratings; they're going to push away loyal viewers in exchange for fickle ones. I want to watch a ballgame on ESPN, not a soap opera about the players' wives. I cannot understand specialty cable networks abandoning their raison d'etre.
10
posted on
06/22/2005 10:00:32 AM PDT
by
Cyclopean Squid
(Time is a wonderful teacher; unfortunately, it kills all its pupils. --Hector Berlioz)
To: My Favorite Headache
I think more bio pics would work, but please leave the original series and movies behind. I'd rather watch 24 hours of Stump The Schwab than a series about poker players.
To: My Favorite Headache
Maybe Tilt didn't find an audience because it sucked. Watched half an episode and was bored to death.
I can see his point though, with labor disputes in NHL NBA and MLB, sinking ratings in the NHL, lack of exclusivity with MLB, and the NFL keeping a lot of stuff for their own network, ESPN is now big enough to want revenue that's safe from the leagues.
12
posted on
06/22/2005 10:00:56 AM PDT
by
discostu
(The dude abides)
To: My Favorite Headache
No kidding. The ammount of poker they show is crazy. Who the hell just sits around watching people play cards? What's next, Celebrity Solitaire?
13
posted on
06/22/2005 10:01:15 AM PDT
by
BigBadWolf
(For every animal you don't eat, I'm going to eat three.)
To: My Favorite Headache
They can do with ESPN what they did with MTV ... cut out sports, like they cut out music ... but, when the start messing with CSPAN's formula, well, let's just say a man can only take so much!
To: My Favorite Headache
I ping VERY begrudgingly.
15
posted on
06/22/2005 10:01:44 AM PDT
by
GOP_Raider
(http://justblogbaby.blogspot.com)
To: My Favorite Headache
I cancelled my satellite service, as all the sat/cable channels are getting just as bad as broadcast TV. What's the point?
16
posted on
06/22/2005 10:01:47 AM PDT
by
B Knotts
To: My Favorite Headache
What's next, The Movie Channel, stop showing movies?
17
posted on
06/22/2005 10:03:40 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Flush Newsweek!)
To: My Favorite Headache
Politically, this will mean a further shift to the left on ESPN.
18
posted on
06/22/2005 10:09:00 AM PDT
by
jordan8
To: GSWarrior
The bio-pics should be left on ESPN Classic imo with a showing once maybe twice on the major network or ESPN 2. ESPN ruled in the 80s.
19
posted on
06/22/2005 10:09:18 AM PDT
by
My Favorite Headache
("Scientology is dangerous stuff,it's like forming a religion based around Johnny Quest and Haji.")
To: Cyclopean Squid
So much of this is about the weird economics of cable TV.
About $3 of your cable bill goes to CNN and will continue to do so until 2008, IIRC.
So, by putting the crap on the "flagship", they force cable (and satellite) to take that station as well as the ones people really want. Just like MTV. Gotta go a la carte. I don't think any cable or satellite company should negotiate fees with any commercial station.
20
posted on
06/22/2005 10:10:26 AM PDT
by
AmishDude
(Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson