Isn't sort of 'amusing' that a book that orders its followers to lie in order to deceive unbelievers, is supposed to be used as proof that people using it are telling the truth?
Indeed--it is amusing-- ...."...a book that orders its followers to lie in order to deceive unbelievers, is supposed to be used as proof that people using it are telling the truth?"...
Ditto.
Isn't sort of 'amusing' that a book that orders its followers to lie in order to deceive unbelievers, is supposed to be used as proof that people using it are telling the truth?