Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Islamic Group Calls for Use of Koran to Take Oath
CSN News ^ | June 21, 2005 | Melanie Hunter

Posted on 06/21/2005 3:07:49 PM PDT by BMC1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last
To: BMC1
The Koran teaches its adherents to lie to save the faith. If this is allowed, there will still be no prayer in schools for infidels, but the follwers of Allah will be accommodated..
41 posted on 06/21/2005 3:22:39 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Extraordinary Circumstances- proving PT Barnum was right..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Javelina
I don't see why this is such a big deal.

Because some Freepers are afraid that letting a Muslim swear on a Koran will lead to the downfall of America.

Bring your own book and swear on whatever you want, is my feeling. You're still liable for perjury, no matter what.

42 posted on 06/21/2005 3:23:16 PM PDT by Modernman ("Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made." -Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BMC1

You gotta be kidding me. Any elected official who swears upon a Koran should be impeached and imprisoned the very next nansecond.


43 posted on 06/21/2005 3:23:51 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BMC1

Many of you guys are crazy. Letting Muslims into America is a presciption for endless war. Look at the Middle East for G--'s sake.

If America ceases to be a Judeo-Christian nation, you can to the Bill of Rights in the trash cause it is incompatable with Islam and the Koran.

Just my humble opinion..........


44 posted on 06/21/2005 3:23:55 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (America is gradually becoming the Godless,out-of-control golden-calf scene,in "The Ten Commandments")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2

Those that would lie, will lie. Those that would tell the truth, will do so. No book will change this.


45 posted on 06/21/2005 3:24:00 PM PDT by Roccus (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Any elected official who swears upon a Koran should be impeached and imprisoned the very next nansecond.

Why? Presumably, the people who elected him knew he was a Muslim, so why should it be a problem that he swears on a Koran when he takes office?

46 posted on 06/21/2005 3:25:28 PM PDT by Modernman ("Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made." -Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Peach

"And what about atheists?"

Good budy of mine is an ex-marine, conservative, patriotic, professor of history and an atheist. His suggestion (for him) would be to swear on the Constitution. A document he knows loves and worships (as much as he worships anything).

Oh and he would gut me like a hog if he knew I called him and EX-marine. What the heck do you call Marines who are no longer in the service?


47 posted on 06/21/2005 3:26:12 PM PDT by Ignatius J Reilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2

I think we should make them swear on a stick of TNT, then
place it under the witness chair as an added incentive.


48 posted on 06/21/2005 3:26:23 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Using different books for everyone.

There are some religious sects (J witnesses come to mind) that don't allow swearing oaths of any kind. Some Orthodox Jews will also not swear in a court of law. It has nothing to do with what scriptures are being used, swearing in a secular court is considered by some as taking G-D's name in vain.

Courts have admitted witnesses by "affirmation" saying "Do you affirm to tell the truth?" leaving out "so help you G-D." I believe that in the 18th century this form of testimony was called a "Quaker oath."

49 posted on 06/21/2005 3:26:26 PM PDT by Alouette (The only thing learned from history is that nobody ever learns from history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Javelina
Sorry you don't like my caps but I got the point across.

If you want to change something, you do it by increments.

Have you ever heard the story of the frog in a pot of water?

If you put a frog in a pot of water he won't jump out. If you turn on the heat under that part of water, by the time it gets too hot, he can jump out. IT'S TOO LATE.

Get the point now?
50 posted on 06/21/2005 3:26:37 PM PDT by BMC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ignatius J Reilly

Marines.


51 posted on 06/21/2005 3:27:03 PM PDT by Roccus (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: konaice
Ah, scuze mem but that dirty book contains an explicit permission to lie to non-believers, so any oath taken on it would be pointless.

Ah, scuze mem but that dirty book contains an explicit permission to lie to non-believers, so any oath taken on it would be pointless.

Deserves repeating.

53 posted on 06/21/2005 3:27:12 PM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ignatius J Reilly
makes sense to me to have a muslim swear the quaran

It's not the swearing on the Bible (or any other religious text) that requires one to be truthful, and in Georgia witnesses don't swear on a Bible at all. It's the law of the land that requires them to be truthful ... ie. perjury.

54 posted on 06/21/2005 3:27:39 PM PDT by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ignatius J Reilly

I don't know; once a Marine, always a Marine I thought.


55 posted on 06/21/2005 3:28:05 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Modernman

What book should Satanists use?


56 posted on 06/21/2005 3:28:11 PM PDT by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Javelina

Good! I'll take my academy award now.

Thank you very much.


57 posted on 06/21/2005 3:28:32 PM PDT by BMC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: chris1
What book should Satanists use?

Don't know. Ask them.

58 posted on 06/21/2005 3:28:44 PM PDT by Modernman ("Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made." -Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: andyk
I'm a little surprised we haven't had these complaints before. The article points out the "affirmation" exemption, but I suppose I can appreciate the islamists argument. Regardless, right or wrong, my indifference toward Islam turned to bitterness after 9/11.

Hey Andy. (I don't mean to sound like Gomer or Goober.)

My indifference turned to many things as well. As to whether the judges can decide whether to honor an establishment of religion (Bible but none others), I think the 1st Amendment is very clear on that.

59 posted on 06/21/2005 3:29:07 PM PDT by jimfree (Freep and ye shall find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BMC1

baby steps..baby steps...

eventually youll have to swear by the Koran


60 posted on 06/21/2005 3:29:14 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson