The hysterical writer of this screed, (in a Catholic paper owned by the Legionnaires of Christ, an organization with problems of its own), is wringing his hands over possibilities!!
Bush is the most pro-life president this country has ever had, and has taken some difficult and heroic pro-life stances.
Yet, in this ridiculous article, his name is never mentioned.
Certain people's disagreement of an article only strengthens it.
I noticed the same thing -- your first sentence described this article perfectly!
Ronald Reagan was the most pro-life President in American history...W doesn't even come close...I see you 're still being the Party shill...
lotsa stuff ticks me off about W these days...
but I have to agree, he is the most prolife president we have had...
not just with babies either.
he's that way with our enemies in the 'religion of pieces' too.
way too prolife in letting illegals come here as well.
Having said that, YOU are NO SHILL for pointing it out.
Ronald Reagan, was the governor of California who I REMEMBER signed into law the most liberal abortion on demand legislation in this nation's history. It is part of what made him popular as a governor, and gave him the national notoriety to become candidate for president years later.
Folks say, "well he repented of signing that later".
To which I say, "had he not signed it, he would have very likely NEVER risen to ascendency in his party."
Reagan became more prolife, to get elected. And as far as I remember did nothing to mitigate the abortion crisis.
Bush has at least attempted to do something on a whole host of issues, starting with late term abortions.
Thanks for pointing out W is the 'most prolife president' we have ever had in our lifetimes. It's true.
Dear sinkspur,
"Bush is the most pro-life president this country has ever had,..."
True, but it ain't saying much.
"...and has taken some difficult and heroic pro-life stances."
Bull.
sitetest