Skip to comments.
Judges question use of Quran in taking oath
News & Record (Greensboro, NC) ^
| June 20, 2005
| Eric Collins, Staff Writer
Posted on 06/20/2005 8:29:40 PM PDT by Zunt Toad
GREENSBORO -- All Syidah Mateen wanted was to give Muslim witnesses the chance to be sworn in on the Quran before testifying in Guilford County courtrooms.
But an attempt by the Greensboro Islamic center to donate copies of the Muslim holy text last week sparked a legal debate that has left state court officials scrambling to decide whether to allow the practice.
Officials with the Administrative Office of the Courts in Raleigh are trying to come up with a statewide policy on the issue before news of the controversy sparks a large outcry, spokesman Dick Ellis said.
The AOC will pose the question to the state's judges as they confer this week at judicial conferences in Asheville and Wrightsville Beach, Ellis said.
"We'll take the input of the judges and bring it together and try to come up with an answer that pleases most people and follows the law," he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at news-record.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: court; koran; muslimamericans; oath; quran; yomkippurthebiglie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
1
posted on
06/20/2005 8:29:40 PM PDT
by
Zunt Toad
To: Zunt Toad
All Syidah Mateen wanted was to give Muslim witnesses the chance to be sworn in on the Quran before testifying in Guilford County courtrooms. And from the very first sentance, the story's already loaded.
To: Zunt Toad
Um, I thought the Koran tells it's cult members that it's okay to lie/blow up innocents/blow up your own children, so why would someone swearing on it make any difference?
3
posted on
06/20/2005 8:32:34 PM PDT
by
j-damn
To: Zunt Toad
4
posted on
06/20/2005 8:33:20 PM PDT
by
Cedar
To: j-damn
Because it's another Muzzlem Camel getting it's nose
under the U.S.A.'s tent.
5
posted on
06/20/2005 8:34:09 PM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Taglines often reveal a lot about the inner person...)
To: Zunt Toad
6
posted on
06/20/2005 8:34:54 PM PDT
by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(Enjoy every sandwich.)
To: skip_intro
introducing this writing into American courts when they are trying to stamp out Christianity really pisses me off!
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: skip_intro
And from the very first sentance, the story's already loaded. You're right, the "[we'll] try to come up with an answer that pleases most people and follows the law,..."comment from the Bar says it all.
9
posted on
06/20/2005 8:40:59 PM PDT
by
Zunt Toad
To: Bart Cubbins
Which book has racy tales of daughters seducing their father? What country swears people in on that book? Who is a troll who just signed in today?
10
posted on
06/20/2005 8:41:33 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Zunt Toad
"This is a diverse world, and everybody does not worship or believe the same," she said. Apparently this "diverse world" only applies to the US. What would happen if a Christian wanted to swear on a bible in a middle eastern country where "everybody DOES worship and believe the same"?
When will our courts stop this double standard?
11
posted on
06/20/2005 8:41:33 PM PDT
by
Noachian
(To Control the Judiciary The People Must First Control The Senate)
To: joesnuffy
Because it's another Muzzlem Camel getting it's nose under the U.S.A.'s tent. Do Wiccan's have a holy book?
How about Gaia worshippers?
Let's make it a free for all. Just bring whatever book you choose to court and pledge whatever comes to mind.
It's the new way in 21st century America.
To: Bart Cubbins
And where did that book say it was OK?
In fact, that was condemned.
13
posted on
06/20/2005 8:44:28 PM PDT
by
Guillermo
(42% of suicide bombers in Iraq are Saudi and Bush continues to lick their boots)
To: Zunt Toad
Who will be deemed worthy enough to touch/hold the book, while the person swears the oath upon it?
14
posted on
06/20/2005 8:44:41 PM PDT
by
Paul Atreides
(FACT: You can get more reliable information in a beauty shop, than from the media)
To: Zunt Toad
Muslems aren't suppose to be taking oaths.
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: Zunt Toad
Will they require that the infidel court clerks wear white gloves before handling it?
17
posted on
06/20/2005 8:49:58 PM PDT
by
The Electrician
("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
To: Bart Cubbins
Boring...
Shouldn't you be over at DU bashing America, for being the Nazi state that it is?
18
posted on
06/20/2005 8:50:41 PM PDT
by
Guillermo
(42% of suicide bombers in Iraq are Saudi and Bush continues to lick their boots)
To: Guillermo
19
posted on
06/20/2005 8:54:45 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Zunt Toad
All Syidah Mateen wanted was to give Muslim witnesses the chance to be sworn in on the Quran before testifying in Guilford County courtrooms
Barbara Streisand, islam is a cult
20
posted on
06/20/2005 8:55:33 PM PDT
by
Vision
(When Hillary Says She's Going To Put The Military On Our Borders...She Becomes Our Next President)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson