Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Click on the WND.com link for full story and further links to CaptainsQuarters and RawStory blogs

Hopefully these fake memos will prove to be as bogus as GungaDan's "fake" anti-Bush Killian docs and thus show to the world exactly the leftist pro-islamofascists for the liars they are.

1 posted on 06/20/2005 1:25:28 AM PDT by auzerais
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: auzerais
There's no evidence any one lied or colluded in any wrong-doing. The moonbats appear to have led themselves out on a limb.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
2 posted on 06/20/2005 1:34:15 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais

This sounds hot. It would be fun if it really was a hoax. Some evidence would do the job. We would be able to knock out some MSM again.


3 posted on 06/20/2005 1:37:25 AM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais

"ARE THE DOWNING STREET MEMOS A HOAX?" is not the original published title.

Please use only the original published title, not an edited version when you post a story. Thanks.


4 posted on 06/20/2005 1:37:50 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais

These lying scumbags will never learn.
So much for the "Downing Street Memos", lol.


5 posted on 06/20/2005 1:39:56 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais; All
- here's the debunking:

Did Lucy Ramirez Find The Downing Street Memos?(Fake, but accurate memos??)--The best part is that the reporter retyped these memos and destroyed the originals.
Good Lord, not this again. If they don't have the originals, what do they have?

And my links:

Downingstreetmemo- Smoke, but where's the Fire?


7 posted on 06/20/2005 1:43:53 AM PDT by backhoe (The 1990's? The Decade of Fraud(s)™...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais
"typed copies, destroyed originals"

DSM now suitable as Koran wipe substitute.
8 posted on 06/20/2005 1:51:50 AM PDT by ncountylee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais
What a TOTAL crock !!!! Of course the memo copies are phony. Why is this story getting air time?
10 posted on 06/20/2005 2:15:07 AM PDT by Dustbunny (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais
Follow me, everybody!




Me too! Everyone follow me!


11 posted on 06/20/2005 2:33:43 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais
Doesn't everyone understand that the validity of the documents is not important, only the seriousness of the charge is relevant!

This author can join Jayson Blair, Dan Blather, et al.
12 posted on 06/20/2005 2:47:21 AM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/004746.php
14 posted on 06/20/2005 3:08:13 AM PDT by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais

Funny how, oh what's her name? I can't remember, was it Mary Mapes? The CBS producer?

Remember during the Rathergate memo mess, didn't it come out that she had spoken with the kerry campaign about that fake memo before they aired their fake memo story?

Funny how kerry was in on the beginning of that big lie and now this one two.


15 posted on 06/20/2005 3:43:05 AM PDT by GloriaJane (http://music.download.com/gloriajane "Seems Like Our Press Has Turned Against Our Country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais

More false charges from the Liberals. Makes you wonder about the Durbin memo doesn't it?


16 posted on 06/20/2005 3:46:01 AM PDT by kcordell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais
The blog goes on to suggest that even if the memos could be authenticated, "they're still meaningless." That they simply do not contain any smoking-gun evidence of lies by the Bush administration or the British government of Tony Blair.

But the destruction of the originals IS a smoking gun.

If the two versions were identical, why destroy the originals?

Inquiring minds want to know....

17 posted on 06/20/2005 3:52:38 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais

bookmk ping and thanks


23 posted on 06/20/2005 4:10:30 AM PDT by Dad yer funny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais
If the ability to authenticate the memos or the integrity of the author(if there were "originals")or the chain of custody of the documents does`nt meet the basic level that is required to prosecute a criminal case in a court of law than they should not be given the time of day.

How much did Sen.Conyers little "it`s all Israels fault" make believe hearing cost the taxpayer.

27 posted on 06/20/2005 4:14:46 AM PDT by carlr (The dems slogan "even though we support our nations enemies,don`t question our patriotism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais

Reporters, who never served in the military, and whose attitudes toward the services are colored by their pot-smoking college days have no sense of history.

The Pentagon, I am quite certain, has war plans against every nation on earth. It's not like we are about to start bombing Paris (although that might not be a bad idea), but imagine if some sort of seismic event occurred requiring action against France, and we didn't have plans for it. The same with the other 200 nations on earth.

With World War II looming the US had plans for war against Japan: Code Ornage. But, guess what, we also had plans for war against Great Britain: Code Red (and for dozens of other countries).

Having plans for war against Iraq was prudent and necessary. It is the reporter's lack of historical precedent and hatred for Bush that are driving this story.


29 posted on 06/20/2005 4:30:10 AM PDT by carrier-aviator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais

If my memory serves me somebody was passing off forged documents to prevent the US from dethroning old Saddam from the git go. Didn't the liberals the world over attempt to lay at the feet of the President using fake documents as premise for going to war????


31 posted on 06/20/2005 5:05:20 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais

If they were fake, they'd point more heavily toward "guilt" (Bush's guilt, of course). As they are, the memos reveal nothing.


32 posted on 06/20/2005 5:06:49 AM PDT by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hellinahandcart

Well, well, well.


33 posted on 06/20/2005 5:07:50 AM PDT by sauropod (De gustibus non est disputandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: auzerais

I'm sure the definitive answer will be found here on FR.


35 posted on 06/20/2005 5:25:00 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson