Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen

Which then flies in the face of all those that say they don't want the government in a "personal" matter. Either it was state sponsored euthanasia or it wasn't. It can't be both.


207 posted on 06/21/2005 8:26:51 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]


To: DJ MacWoW
"Which then flies in the face of all those that say they don't want the government in a "personal" matter."

Many people on this board very much wanted to involve the government, at all levels, in this "personal" matter. Some wanted to call out the National Guard to storm the hospital!

This was not euthanasia, state sponsored or otherwise. This was the judicial system enforcing the state constitution, allowing a person to refuse medical treatment. Period.

You may argue that this wasn't Terri's wish. Fine. You may argue that a feeding tube isn't medical treatment. Fine.

But for those of us who agree with the judge's decision, they were.

237 posted on 06/21/2005 9:08:48 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson