Skip to comments.
Judge Strikes Down Ban on Single Beer Sales
ABC 7 ^
| 6/19/05
| ABC 7
Posted on 06/18/2005 10:13:54 PM PDT by freedom44
Washington (AP) - Buying a single can or bottle of beer will still be legal in the near future in some parts of Northwest Washington.
A federal judge has struck down the District's ban on such sales in Ward 4, ruling that the D.C. Council hastily passed it last fall without the required public notice.
It was supposed to begin last November, but never took effect because the judge blocked its enforcement until the larger legal questions could be decided. This week, she struck down the law.
The measure was known as the Fenty Amendment after sponsor Adrian Fenty introduced it as a means to reduce litter and drinking on sidewalks. There are similar bans in the Mount Pleasant and Adams Morgan neighborhoods.
Fenty says he will ask the council to act again on the ban and that he will urge city lawyers to appeal the ruling.
Opponents say the ban would devastate mom & pop stores that count on single sales for as much as 50 percent of their income in some months.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: aclulist; beer; dc; govwatch; libertarians; ruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
06/18/2005 10:13:54 PM PDT
by
freedom44
To: freedom44
a means to reduce litter and drinking on sidewalks.For every one can, there will now be five others.
To: freedom44
Whew! Some of us like to make 18 trips to the liquor store in one night. Is that so wrong????
3
posted on
06/18/2005 10:17:11 PM PDT
by
CO Gal
(Liberals should be seen, but not heard..)
To: freedom44
Would this count as a single?
4
posted on
06/18/2005 10:20:35 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
("You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.")
To: freedom44
When did they outlaw Ice Chests?
5
posted on
06/18/2005 10:21:03 PM PDT
by
TexasTransplant
(NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
To: freedom44
The Capital of Washington = Olympia
The kind of Beer I drink in the Great Northwest Rayyyyy Neeeeerr Beeeeeeeeer!
Olympia beer isn't bad either, but they just don't know how to advertise.
6
posted on
06/18/2005 10:25:23 PM PDT
by
TexasTransplant
(NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
To: freedom44
I'm a beer "buyer" as my profession and I've never understood these restrictions. I've have retailers I work with whose beer licenses have restrictions on them that forbid them from selling singles. This makes no sense.
The alcoholic control board does this to keep drunks from buying singles and drinking them right then and there on the street. So what's the answer.... make them buy a six pack and drink it right then and there on the street? SMART!!!!
7
posted on
06/18/2005 10:27:13 PM PDT
by
Private_Sector_Does_It_Better
(The UN did such a fine job with "Oil for Food" in Iraq, let's let them run the whole country!)
To: freedom44
this is literally the most backwards law i have ever seen. no dont buy just a can buy a six pack! what kind of moron...
8
posted on
06/18/2005 10:33:58 PM PDT
by
minus_273
To: freedom44
in case anyone was wondering.. this was introduced by a
DUmmie
9
posted on
06/18/2005 10:35:29 PM PDT
by
minus_273
To: SIDENET; freedom44
Would this count as a single? thats not a single beer
That's a single beer
10
posted on
06/18/2005 10:38:38 PM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
(A wowser, lacking any of the greater virtues, makes up that lack by denunciation of little vices)
To: freedom44
[The measure was known as the Fenty Amendment after sponsor Adrian Fenty introduced it as a means to reduce litter and drinking on sidewalks.]
B.S.
Every time you see a law like this that puts some tedious obstruction in the way of adults getting access to alcohol, you can be assured it's the prohibitionists trying to whittle away at our freedom for our own good.
11
posted on
06/18/2005 10:44:44 PM PDT
by
spinestein
(See Dick talk. See Dick rant. See Dick compare the U.S. to Hitler and Stalin. Don't be a DICK!)
To: minus_273
Of course it was. The backwards logic is a dead give away.
"Make them drink less beer by forcing them to buy more beer" BRILLIANT!!!
12
posted on
06/18/2005 10:46:14 PM PDT
by
Private_Sector_Does_It_Better
(The UN did such a fine job with "Oil for Food" in Iraq, let's let them run the whole country!)
To: freedom44
I loved those things when I was Designated Driver in college. A single Guinness.
To: SIDENET
14
posted on
06/18/2005 10:50:28 PM PDT
by
spinestein
(See Dick talk. See Dick rant. See Dick compare the U.S. to Hitler and Stalin. Don't be a DICK!)
To: freedom44
Good, singles should be able to buy beer too.
15
posted on
06/18/2005 10:52:44 PM PDT
by
Stonedog
(I don't know what your problem is, but I bet it's difficult to pronounce.)
To: freedom44
"FREEEEDOMMMM!!!"
16
posted on
06/18/2005 10:55:30 PM PDT
by
RichInOC
(...Phi Kappa Sigma, Beta Rho '87...my liver is evil. I must kill it.)
To: freedom44
In Massachusetts it is illegal for liquor stores to sell milk.
Micromanagement at its finest. We can still get singles, though we don't pollute with them.. Bottle bill and all.
We just dump old dish washers, water heaters and television sets on the side of the highways.. Local sticker laws and all.
17
posted on
06/18/2005 11:02:59 PM PDT
by
mmercier
To: Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
so requiring people to by 6 times as many cans is going to cut down on the litter how?You gotta hand it to this guys plastic surgeon he did a damn good job of covering up the lobotomy scars
To: freedom44
And the thing about my jokes is, they don't hurt anybody. You can take 'em or leave 'em - you can say they're funny or they're terrible or they're good, or whatever, but you can just pass 'em by. But with Congress, every time they make a joke, it's a law! And every time they make a law, it's a joke! - Will Rogers
19
posted on
06/18/2005 11:42:08 PM PDT
by
Nasty McPhilthy
(Those who beat their swords into plow shears….will plow for those who don’t.)
To: freedom44
Opponents say the ban would devastate mom & pop stores that count on single sales for as much as 50 percent of their income in some months.That is the likely target or something similar. The big boys don't want the competition and pay the politicians to do the job for them. Of course the politicians have to cover it with some high sounding principle. Anytime something like this comes up we must, all together now - "Follow the Money". Figure out who will gain financially, besides the politicians of course, and you have it.
20
posted on
06/19/2005 1:04:16 AM PDT
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson