Skip to comments.
Russia, China join against US 'star wars'
MENAFN ^
| June 17, 2005
Posted on 06/18/2005 3:26:49 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: Tailgunner Joe
Russia, China, and the UN, this is for you!
2
posted on
06/18/2005 3:28:52 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
("You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.")
To: Tailgunner Joe
The headline could've been taken right out of the mid-80s.
3
posted on
06/18/2005 3:29:50 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Tailgunner Joe
One nuclear weapon detonated in near space would therefore melt down the entire electronic communications network of the United States. That could ruin the U.S. economy and utterly disrupt society
Do they really think we would sit still for that?
4
posted on
06/18/2005 3:30:35 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Mr. Mojo
Except for the China part, of course.
5
posted on
06/18/2005 3:30:37 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Tailgunner Joe
The easiest way to paralyze the entire U.S. space satellite system in so-called Low Earth Orbit, or LEO, they warn, is by detonating a nuclear weapon above the Earth to produce a radiation belt at the altitude where the satellites orbit.
The radioactive debris will land on their own territory causing destruction against themselves. They will also deny access of their own.
6
posted on
06/18/2005 3:31:17 PM PDT
by
Wiz
To: Jeff Head
7
posted on
06/18/2005 3:31:32 PM PDT
by
Wiz
To: Tailgunner Joe
Who cares? They only oppose the US from developing new technology
because it will make it harder for them to kill us.
The cloud formation below summarizes my feeling about letting China and
Russia dictate our defense strategies.

Holtz
JeffersonRepublic.com
8
posted on
06/18/2005 3:33:26 PM PDT
by
JeffersonRepublic.com
(Visit my web site and win ....... nothing! The government took it in taxes.)
To: Paul_Denton
9
posted on
06/18/2005 3:37:39 PM PDT
by
monkeywrench
(Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Tell you what. If Russia and China want to divide the question, there might be room to talk.
One question is military applications of outer space.
The other question is private property rights in outer space.
The two questions have been linked for reasons understandable only to one world hegemons.
Once private property rights are recognized by Russia, the US, England, and China, then the military question can be brought up, divided into logical units, and discussed.
10
posted on
06/18/2005 3:38:01 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Some may think I am a methodist)
To: Tailgunner Joe
"The war games are expected to involve Russia's strategic Tu-95MS bombers firing cruise missiles, presumably an exercise on how to overcome missile defense,"
We can always have some "games" on how to overcome their TU-95s.
11
posted on
06/18/2005 3:38:41 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
("You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.")
To: Tailgunner Joe
Imagine that...The Chicoms and the "We want to be communist again" crowd oppose U.S. missile defense. Who'da thunk it.
12
posted on
06/18/2005 3:45:59 PM PDT
by
Stonedog
(I don't know what your problem is, but I bet it's difficult to pronounce.)
To: tet68
Also, if China, Russia or even North Korea were to detonate a single nuclear weapon in the upper atmosphere it would produce an electric magnetic pulse, or EMP. One nuclear weapon detonated in near space would therefore melt down the entire electronic communications network of the United States. That could ruin the U.S. economy and utterly disrupt society.True? Or a sort of Y2K scare?
Don't forget, red wine and beer are now good for you.
To: Stonedog
Let the Chicoms and Ruskies waster their money trying to keep up with us.
I suppose the UN will turn a blind "ironic eye" at China begging for demilitarization as they continue the incredible missile buildup opposite the Taiwan Straits.
To: rbmillerjr
Unlike the Ruskies of the Cold War we buy all our crap from Red China which fuels their war machine with OUR money.
American marketing departments are trying to figure out how to sell a rope, made in China, to the Chinese market so they can hang us with it. Little do they know the Chinese have planned the ropes construction for years and are waiting for the right opportunity to use it.
Excuse my cynicism but the lack of forsight in this situation astounds me.
To: DCPatriot
Very true. Very scary. I suppose that's why we don't hear much about it. The latest edition of Imprimis has an excellent piece describing the EMP threat.
16
posted on
06/18/2005 4:48:00 PM PDT
by
msf92497
(My brain is "twitchy")
To: Tailgunner Joe
All the more reason to put weapons OFFENSIVE and defensive in space!
17
posted on
06/18/2005 4:55:46 PM PDT
by
Paul_Denton
(Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
To: monkeywrench
thanks for the ping. China and Russia as well as states like Iran and North Korea ARE the reason to put weapons in space.
18
posted on
06/18/2005 4:57:03 PM PDT
by
Paul_Denton
(Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
To: SIDENET
How would they factor in the F-22/F-15 interception of the Bombers?
To: Tailgunner Joe
This article strikes me as a typical biased article whose intent is to defuse notions of developing a comprehensive space based missile defense system.
Its all hopeless you see...lets just get along with comprehensive arms control treaties. But Reagan knew differently.
All is not lost...we once took great pains to design some satellites to be resistant to radiation....to survive.
Lets get going with Son of Star Wars...a comprehensive space based system which targets launch vehicles during the boost phase when they are most vulnerable....nullifying the MIRV capability.
JMHO...but the semiconductor technology we have today makes approaches that were unfeasible back in the 80's feasible today.
20
posted on
06/18/2005 5:33:48 PM PDT
by
Dat Mon
(will work for clever tagline)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson