Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia, China join against US 'star wars'
MENAFN ^ | June 17, 2005

Posted on 06/18/2005 3:26:49 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 06/18/2005 3:26:50 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Russia, China, and the UN, this is for you!


2 posted on 06/18/2005 3:28:52 PM PDT by SIDENET ("You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

The headline could've been taken right out of the mid-80s.


3 posted on 06/18/2005 3:29:50 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

One nuclear weapon detonated in near space would therefore melt down the entire electronic communications network of the United States. That could ruin the U.S. economy and utterly disrupt society

Do they really think we would sit still for that?


4 posted on 06/18/2005 3:30:35 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Except for the China part, of course.


5 posted on 06/18/2005 3:30:37 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The easiest way to paralyze the entire U.S. space satellite system in so-called Low Earth Orbit, or LEO, they warn, is by detonating a nuclear weapon above the Earth to produce a radiation belt at the altitude where the satellites orbit.

The radioactive debris will land on their own territory causing destruction against themselves. They will also deny access of their own.
6 posted on 06/18/2005 3:31:17 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

ping


7 posted on 06/18/2005 3:31:32 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Who cares? They only oppose the US from developing new technology
because it will make it harder for them to kill us.

The cloud formation below summarizes my feeling about letting China and
Russia dictate our defense strategies.


Holtz
JeffersonRepublic.com

8 posted on 06/18/2005 3:33:26 PM PDT by JeffersonRepublic.com (Visit my web site and win ....... nothing! The government took it in taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton

Interesting.


9 posted on 06/18/2005 3:37:39 PM PDT by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Tell you what. If Russia and China want to divide the question, there might be room to talk.

One question is military applications of outer space.

The other question is private property rights in outer space.

The two questions have been linked for reasons understandable only to one world hegemons.

Once private property rights are recognized by Russia, the US, England, and China, then the military question can be brought up, divided into logical units, and discussed.

10 posted on 06/18/2005 3:38:01 PM PDT by RightWhale (Some may think I am a methodist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
"The war games are expected to involve Russia's strategic Tu-95MS bombers firing cruise missiles, presumably an exercise on how to overcome missile defense,"

We can always have some "games" on how to overcome their TU-95s.


11 posted on 06/18/2005 3:38:41 PM PDT by SIDENET ("You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Imagine that...The Chicoms and the "We want to be communist again" crowd oppose U.S. missile defense. Who'da thunk it.


12 posted on 06/18/2005 3:45:59 PM PDT by Stonedog (I don't know what your problem is, but I bet it's difficult to pronounce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Also, if China, Russia or even North Korea were to detonate a single nuclear weapon in the upper atmosphere it would produce an electric magnetic pulse, or EMP. One nuclear weapon detonated in near space would therefore melt down the entire electronic communications network of the United States. That could ruin the U.S. economy and utterly disrupt society.

True? Or a sort of Y2K scare?

Don't forget, red wine and beer are now good for you.

13 posted on 06/18/2005 3:50:01 PM PDT by DCPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stonedog

Let the Chicoms and Ruskies waster their money trying to keep up with us.

I suppose the UN will turn a blind "ironic eye" at China begging for demilitarization as they continue the incredible missile buildup opposite the Taiwan Straits.


14 posted on 06/18/2005 4:02:39 PM PDT by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
Unlike the Ruskies of the Cold War we buy all our crap from Red China which fuels their war machine with OUR money.

American marketing departments are trying to figure out how to sell a rope, made in China, to the Chinese market so they can hang us with it. Little do they know the Chinese have planned the ropes construction for years and are waiting for the right opportunity to use it.

Excuse my cynicism but the lack of forsight in this situation astounds me.
15 posted on 06/18/2005 4:35:42 PM PDT by RockyMtnMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot

Very true. Very scary. I suppose that's why we don't hear much about it. The latest edition of Imprimis has an excellent piece describing the EMP threat.


16 posted on 06/18/2005 4:48:00 PM PDT by msf92497 (My brain is "twitchy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

All the more reason to put weapons OFFENSIVE and defensive in space!


17 posted on 06/18/2005 4:55:46 PM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench

thanks for the ping. China and Russia as well as states like Iran and North Korea ARE the reason to put weapons in space.


18 posted on 06/18/2005 4:57:03 PM PDT by Paul_Denton (Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

How would they factor in the F-22/F-15 interception of the Bombers?


19 posted on 06/18/2005 5:33:48 PM PDT by John Will
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
This article strikes me as a typical biased article whose intent is to defuse notions of developing a comprehensive space based missile defense system.

Its all hopeless you see...lets just get along with comprehensive arms control treaties. But Reagan knew differently.

All is not lost...we once took great pains to design some satellites to be resistant to radiation....to survive.

Lets get going with Son of Star Wars...a comprehensive space based system which targets launch vehicles during the boost phase when they are most vulnerable....nullifying the MIRV capability.

JMHO...but the semiconductor technology we have today makes approaches that were unfeasible back in the 80's feasible today.
20 posted on 06/18/2005 5:33:48 PM PDT by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson