[rummyelendil]

[The plan] was contingency based on a pilot being shot down and held hostage.
Thanks for the info, I appreciate it. You are right, the memos certainly don't describe this kind of plan, or give any indication of it. Is your reason for saying that this implies that the memos are fake because any invasion plan would be built upon this hostage-contingency plan? As in, if we have an invasion plan ready, we might as well use it?

[bad company]

Thanks for the info, I appreciate it. You are right, the memos certainly don't describe this kind of plan, or give any indication of it. Is your reason for saying that this implies that the memos are fake because any invasion plan would be built upon this hostage-contingency plan? As in, if we have an invasion plan ready, we might as well use it?

The point is that they didn't want to have to have a plan like this on the table anymore.

The liberal media has had a major case of amnesia over the reasons for going to war. The only reason they can remember is WMD's. The thing that tied a liberal British prime minister to a conservative president in this war is the fact that these two countries were both stuck patrolling the no-fly zone. It was a disaster waiting to happen. Any memo that goes over the reasons for the British and Americans going together in this war is going to at least breifly mention that. It's been a while since I've seen the document but I do remember when I read it, it contained all of the popularly remembered reasons for going to war, but only the ones the liberals want to remember.

The thing that really tied us to the British in the reason for going to was is the no-fly zone.