[wyattearp]

Because you are not being denied a service that you are entitled to receive.

I see. So, if somebody is being "denied a service" that they are "entitled to receive", they should get their money back, but if somebody else is paying through the nose for that "entitlement" with no intention of ever using the "service", they should have to continue to pay through the nose?

It never ceases to amaze me how home-schooling parents consistently demand that they should get MY money back in THEIR pocket. I want MY money back in MY pocket!

[Born in a Rage]

Well, then you should be on your knees thanking people who homeschool their kids because we make school taxes that much lower for everyone who pays school taxes. If there are 300 homeschoolers in your district and the public school spend 10,000 per kid - then the public just saved 300,000. Shame on you for thinking it would be such a travesty for you to "allow" a little girl to play in the school band as a part-timer - wow. I hope I never become that bitter of a person.

[Amish with an attitude]

"It never ceases to amaze me how home-schooling parents consistently demand that they should get MY money back in THEIR pocket"

I would never consider a refund, too many strings would be attached to it.

[DaGman]

"It never ceases to amaze me how home-schooling parents consistently demand that they should get MY money back in THEIR pocket. I want MY money back in MY pocket!"

Ain't it the truth. That's along with making up the rules to fit them as they go along. I have a problem with people that want it both ways. Either go to public school or don't go to public school. Choose, then live with the decision.